Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

Originally posted by Realtruth
This was not an actual missile, it was a containment cylinder that Washington and ALL Politicians were using to store all their BS.

The unfortunate part was they implemented the storage unit on 11/7/2010 and it was suppose to hold 10 years worth of BS, but it ruptured after one day.

edit on 10-11-2010 by Realtruth because: (no reason given)

It is posting such as this that makes ATS a less fear-mongering, paranoid place. Thumbs up, my jovial friend.

Originally posted by JimOberg
All missiles on Ohio class missiles are fitted with nuclear warheads, he said. Because they are controlled by a system of codes, a warhead can only be destroyed by detonation, the general said.

so in essence he's saying that
ALL Ohio Class Submarine Nuclear
Missiles once launched can only
end in detonation.

If that's the case, then there
should be some sort of evidence
world wide of a nuclear explosion.
I have not heard of one yet.

mehhhh !!!
Who cares what us peons think anyway?

Our potential adversaries think we launched
an unsanctioned ICBM from a sub. Shouldn't
we be more concerned about what THEY think?
It's their finger on the nuclear trigger.

I remember as a lil boy,
my daddy digging a basement
with a fall-out shelter cuz some
arsehole parked a couple dozens
nuclear warheads 90 miles off the coast
of Florida.

That theory may have to be re-visited.

reply to post by brigand

NORAD does not issue threat alerts. DHS does.

The last change in aviation threat level occurred on August 13, 2006. From red to orange for UK flights. Domestic flights have been at orange since August 10, 2006.

www.dhs.gov...

Originally posted by natters
Just been reading along, I'm totally fascinated and not yet 100% convinced its a plane. But I just thought it was interesting that NORADS threat level is at high...wonder why?

www.norad.mil...

The threat level quoted on NORADS home page is the DHS Aviation Threat Level and does not necessarily reflect the threat level inside NORAD itself. It is there for public information purposes.

The main threat level that NORAD would recommend a change in would be the DEFCON level.

Respectfully

Doc

reply to post by snowspirit


Where do you get "high"? I clicked on the NORAD link and the threat level is blinking organe, not red. Click on that and it takes you to the DHS Web site and you get this:
"Current Threat Level
November 10, 2010
•The United States government's national threat level is Elevated, or Yellow."
"

Possibly it was one of our enemies staging a missle launch towards asia to start conflict between the US and what ever country it was intended to be pointed at... Remember there are 34 or so Warships and planes near asia right now, whoever launched the missle most likely wanted it to look like an attack from the US.

Originally posted by pajoly
reply to post by snowspirit

 

Where do you get "high"? I clicked on the NORAD link and the threat level is blinking organe, not red. Click on that and it takes you to the DHS Web site and you get this:
"Current Threat Level
November 10, 2010
•The United States government's national threat level is Elevated, or Yellow."
"

I assumed that because it was blinking orange. So I went by that, not what they stated in words.

www.dhs.gov...

The United States government's national threat level is Elevated, or Yellow. For all domestic and international flights, the U.S. threat level is High, or Orange.

My bad. I didn't realize there would be different threat levels for National, and aviation. Yellow says elevated, Orange says high. Red says severe.

When I looked yesterday, all I saw was elevated, yellow.

if you don't understand the thing you look at, check what's sourrounding it:
maybe these two news-snippets are connected to the missile ?

U.S. aircraft carrier delivers supplies to stranded cruise ship
news.xinhuanet.com...

Is it going there to "deliver" supplies or checking what's going on / controlling passengers aka eyewitnesses?


Mystery Ship Spotted Cruising The Waters Off Three Tree Point
www.b-townblog.com...

"The ship is involved in research on “topographic form drag.” Boiled down, what this amounts to is determining the affect that features of the ocean floor have on the flow of current."

If they can detect the features of the ocean floor; can they be used to detect stealth submarines ?

reply to post by windwaker
[more ]No.....one does not normally launch a missle over their own country to demonstrate their own power...however I remember the Chinese 'implying' a while ago that they could move their submarines very close to our shores and we would not know as one of our former presidents allow our stealth technology for subs to be passed to them. Their military powers said, in so many words, that their technology was very advanced and in some areas (remember the maneuvering long range missle from a few months back) excede ours. So it just might, just might be a Chinese sub launching this missle to remind us that they could, if they wanted to, launch one. or more, over our country. Just a thought.

Enjoy the suspense.

I'm gonna re-quote, because I find it highly informative:

From page 25 of the weekly report above, it was also in last week's USGS Marine Safety Bulletin (page 14 of 23).

"Pacific Missile Test Range, Point MaguDeparting the IMO approved TSS and transiting south of the Channel Islands may result in delays and diversions, as this transit will take vessels through the Pacific Missile Test Range, Point Mugu, California. The U.S. Navy advises that hazardous operations may take place within the test range. The test range extends for 180 miles in a South West direction from Point Mugu and is up to 210 miles wide."

deleted for ATS protocol.

sorry

snoopyuk

Not sure if this helps, but I havent seen anybody post it. This is a possible answer to the missle launch, it is a notice of launch for the area and time that the missle was launched. Here is the address to report from Page 55 of the current Notice to Mariners report: 164.214.12.45...


"434/10(18).
EASTERN NORTH PACIFIC.
CALIFORNIA.
MISSILES.
1. INTERMITTENT MISSILE FIRING OPERATIONS 0001Z TO 2359Z
DAILY MONDAY THRU SUNDAY IN THE NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER
SEA RANGE. THE MAJORITY OF MISSILE FIRINGS TAKE PLACE
1400Z TO 2359Z AND 0001Z TO 0200Z DAILY MONDAY THRU FRIDAY
IN AREA BOUND BY
34-02N 119-04W, 33-52N 119-06W, 33-29N 118-37W,
33-20N 118-37W, 32-11N 120-16W, 31-54N 121-35W,
35-09N 123-39W, 35-29N 123-00W, 35-57N 121-32W,
34-04N 119-04W.
2. VESSELS MAY BE REQUESTED TO ALTER COURSE WITHIN THE ABOVE
AREA DUE TO FIRING OPERATIONS AND ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT
PLEAD CONTROL ON 5081.5 MHZ (5080 KHZ) OR 3238.5 KHZ (3237 KHZ)
SECONDARY OR 156.8 MHZ (CH 16) OR 127.55 MHZ BEFORE ENTERING
THE ABOVE BOUNDARIES AND MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS GUARD WHILE
WITHIN THE RANGE.
3. VESSELS INBOUND AND OUTBOUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PORTS
WILL CREATE THE LEAST INTERFERENCE TO FIRING OPERATIONS
DURING THE SPECIFIC PERIODS, AS WELL AS ENHANCE THE VESSEL'S SAFETY WHEN PASSING THROUGH THE VICINITY OF THE SEA RANGE
IF THEY WILL TRANSIT VIA THE SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL AND WITHIN
NINE MILES OFFSHORE VICINITY OF POINT MUGU OR CROSS THE AREA
SOUTHWEST OF SAN NICOLAS ISLAND BETWEEN SUNSET AND SUNRISE.

CNN just reported that the Missile is Actually a plane...atleast according to the Pentagon...

I wonder how a plane lit up the sky like the witnesses described...

I guess a professor thinks otherwise...

CNN

These stinkers wanna go ahead and say it was some plane and not a missile even thuogh the news movie showed it was a missile? WHAt they gonna tell us next, that the plane just happened to look like a missile? I thinks sumbuddies pulling our chain. ( the goverment knows it was either china or iran that did it when they snuck ups to our west coast shore and fired the darn thing at us )

Originally posted by sickofitall2012
reply to post by JimOberg

 

I'm pretty sure that a plane can be filmed at night.
Blinking lights and all. We have not been shown the end of his video, why? That would end the question of which way it was moving. The Pentagon said the object was moving away from land, don't you think they saw the full 10 min.?

is this helpful:

www.necn.com...

nevermind

reply to post by shift44


I posted it on page 115

Originally posted by sickofitall2012
reply to post by Phage

 

Don't start Phage, you know very well Fox mentioned that several times yesterday. I was listening to it live. The pentagon said that there was no threat to Americans because the object was moving away from land. I heard it, and my husband heard it.

I was monitoring Fox, and I didn't hear it.

Their coverage is on their website, too.

If you can't find it, I don't find your claim at all worthy of belief.

If it was a plane then what kind of plane. Commercial or military? Flight number? Destination? These things would be written down somewhere. It was a rocket. Some sort of secret test i suppose, or a misfire/hack job that would look bad on the government. The rocket had to come from somewhere so somebody knows.