It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The conclusion is good news for BP, which has been widely criticized for letting concerns about the roughly $1.5 million a day cost of the drilling rig affect choices that might have prevented the blowout.
"To date, we have not seen a single instance where a human being made a conscious decision to favor dollars over safety," said Fred Bartlit, general counsel for the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling.
He added that he didn't believe that rig workers "want to risk their lives or the lives of their buddies." He said: "I've been on a lot of rigs, and I don't believe people sit there and say, 'This is really dangerous, but the guys in London will make more money.' We don't see a concrete situation where people made a trade-off of safety for dollars."
Bartlit said that BP's much criticized design for the well, known as the long string design, did not directly cause the April 20 accident. And Sambhav Sankar, the deputy chief counsel for the commission, said that the design offered "some value over the long-term life of the well."
But they said BP's well design did pose several other problems that might have indirectly contributed to the explosion.
They said that the design limited choices about how much cement could be used to seal the well and should have made both BP and its cement contractor, Halliburton, very cautious about how they proceeded.
He added that he didn't believe that rig workers "want to risk their lives or the lives of their buddies." He said: "I've been on a lot of rigs, and I don't believe people sit there and say, 'This is really dangerous, but the guys in London will make more money.' We don't see a concrete situation where people made a trade-off of safety for dollars."