posted on Nov, 14 2010 @ 04:39 PM
Originally posted by amadeus30
Yes as a matter of fact I did read the article.
Did YOU read the article??
An international commission headed by Nobel laureate Wiesel said in 2004 that between 280,000 and 380,000 Romanian and Ukrainian Jews were
killed in Romania and areas it during World War Two as an ally of Nazi Germany.
Yes, and as I have highlighted, it confirms my point that the area, and therefore any atrocities committed there, were the responsibility of Romanian
and not German troops. I mean, credit where credit is due. Apart from a brief foray into Fascism under the Iron Guard, who made the original
alliance with Germany, the Romanian military was in complete control over their country. The Romanians hardly had a history of kindness to Jews with
the preceding century just consisting of one pogrom after another, mostly caused by inciting local prejudices with propaganda disseminated through the
various Christian Churches. Very much the same as was happening throughout Europe at the time, but in Romania, Hungary and the Balkans, the rise of
racialism was particularly impactive due to the diversity of the population. It took very little agitation on the part of Germany to set off the
violence against the Jews in those regions, again, and it required the Romanian military to take command of the situation and arrest the puppet
Dictator of the Iron Guard, and renegotiate terms with Hitler. Those terms consisted of no interference on domestic matters, and so, rather than
being beaten to death by their former neighbours, the Jews were more summarily executed by the Romanian army.
Originally posted by amadeus30
You're correct to say it was Romanian troops that killed these Jews, however they were allies and occupied by Nazi Germany.
Germany would have had, maybe, a couple of Party officials, and their staff, perhaps a representative of the Gestapo or SS, but not really what you
would call an occupation. Nobody had to force the Romanians to kill the Jews, they merely had to say it was 'OK' to kill them. I think that that is
a distinction worth making.
edit on 14-11-2010 by KilgoreTrout because: things are very complicated