posted on Nov, 6 2010 @ 02:27 PM
Actually why Bush should be in jail but isn't. A good read.
www.ringnebula.com...
An executive order cannot limit a president. There is no constitutional requirement for a president to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes
to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the president has instead modified or waived it.
Whitehouse said, “These three Bush administration legal propositions boil down to this: one, ‘I don’t have to follow my own rules, and I don’t
have to tell you when I’m breaking them’; two, ‘I get to determine what my own powers are’; and three, ‘The Department of Justice doesn’t
tell me what the law is, I tell the Department of Justice what the law is.’”
Bush sure sounds like a Democrat to me.
All these Democrats blaming Bush for everything but loving the man so much.
They went after Nixon. They went after Reagan. Bush they protect and admire as a true leader of their party. I think it is time for the Democrats here
to re-think their stand on Bush and see how their party leadership really stands on the Bush issue.