posted on Nov, 2 2010 @ 06:28 AM
reply to post by IndianaOps
Like a lot of ideas that get touched by bureaucracy, "think tanks" started as a good idea. There's an old saying that "When all you have is a
hammer, every problem looks like a nail", and that's as true in the academic, corporate, and government worlds as it is anywhere else. "Think
tanks" were originally created to provide 'outside eyes" that could look at data or situations without contamination by institutional prejudices
(or, more realistically, with a different set of institutional prejudices) in order to facilitate better decision making. They were intended to be
professional 'thinkers outside the box', if you will.
The problem is that they bring their own preconceived notions and prejudices...and, of course, there's always the impulse to make ones' findings or
analysis fit the agenda of the person or organization paying the bills. Some of the "think tanks" manage to overcome these problems...others don't
bother trying, and simply rubber-stamp what's fed to them.