It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is NASA Covering Up the 100-Year Starship? (just out)

page: 4
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 6 2012 @ 08:43 PM
link   
www.bbc.co.uk...

Says they picked the astronaut that's going to lead the project.



posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 05:15 AM
link   
This DARPA plan is the most moronic plan ever devised in the history of space exploration. The money is enough only for the paperwork and the design plans of some small part of the engine, and the actual one way trip technology that will be developed will be useless for any other trip. If the project is ever realized, the only outcome would be that there would be some skeletons in Mars inside some artificial habitat, without any true advances in technology that will help us colonize other planets.

The correct thing to do is to build a big mothership in space, like a small floating city, a ship that will travel easily to other planets using nuclear propulsion, with huge rotating sections to simulate gravity, and big enough space to host smaller spaceships that can land on planets and farming to satisfy the needs of its crew.

With such a ship, visiting other planets of the solar system, including Mars, will become routine. The trips will continue to be long, but they would be much more comfortable, due to the artficial gravity via rotation. People will eat naturally grown organic food, grown inside the spaceship, and so they will be feeded normally as on Earth.

The living space would be good enough for people to have their families on board, so as that they can relax and live a normal life, dedicating their work to science on board this spacecraft.

Now, that would be a true 100-year starship. Not this #ty death capsule DARPA and NASA have in mind.



posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 05:28 AM
link   
Is that right? 35 million miles? there is no star within that distance, nearest star is 6 trillion miles away, (I think) or 4.2 light years, a 3 star system called Alfa Centuri, (spell checker on the fritz).



posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 09:54 AM
link   
reply to post by pikestaff
 


Actually a light year is about 5,878,625,373,183.608 miles (about 6 trillion miles), so the closest star is over 4 times that distance. But I will credit you with coming up with that 6 trillion figure estimate, you just fdidn't multiply that.



posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 01:53 PM
link   
It's not going to stop once it gets going. Never going to happen but wars are winding down and have to spend some money



posted on Jan, 8 2012 @ 02:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Max_TO
 


gene modification ? for a planet , how do we know what modifictions are needed , how do we know what planet to go to , and what about viruses , we have to know what viruses are on this planet before we can find a vaccine to immunise against.

i think that we are still children and still exploring our back yard .
we are no way near ready to venture out into the cosmos




top topics
 
15
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join