It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NamelessMonster2
While the site is utter bunk, anyone want to take a stab at the pagan symbolism it mentions in revelations?
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Ignoring the UFO cult hoopla,and obviously goofy conclusions, anyone think that these pagan symbols influenced the Book of Revelations?
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by NamelessMonster2
While the site is utter bunk, anyone want to take a stab at the pagan symbolism it mentions in revelations?
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
Ignoring the UFO cult hoopla,and obviously goofy conclusions, anyone think that these pagan symbols influenced the Book of Revelations?
We can quickly dismiss it. The Egyptians did practice some types of animal sacrifice, but lambs weren't among them since sheep weren't in Egypt when the worship of Isis began. Goats, yes. Sheep, no. "Philadelphia" doesn't mean "Goddess of Delphia." Phila/philos means "lover of" (abstract, as in "I love my parents" or "I love my brother" and not physical) and delphia (adelphos) means brother. So, "City of brotherly love."
Very few goddesses had the lion as their symbol (generally gods had lions, but not goddesses) and none of the few who were associated with lions are mentioned.
...and so forth and so on.
Yet another site by someone who isn't aware that there are languages on this planet other than English and has no idea of timelines and what events happened when.
In Mandaeanism, this name (Ruha d-Qudsha) refers to an evil female spirit allied with the Jewish God, whom they call Adunay and consider an evil spirit. They believe that Ruha d-Qudsha founded Jerusalem and, together with her sons, the seven planets.
Originally posted by rectangle
Elaine Pagels is a Christian
and a college professor who writes books about Theology.
One of her points is that the New Testament is a product of its time.
Written after the death of Christ it reflects not only who what Christ is, but the position the Christians wanted to take in regard to the ongoing Roman occupation of Palestine... Christians turned down their fellow Jews and wanted to send a message to the Romans that Christianity was not a threat to the Romans, therefore the Romans should not persecute the Christians. Not having the exact quote, I paraphrase Elaine Pagels, “The New Testament is a piece of war time propaganda. By turning down their fellow Jews the Christians made an enemy. That Christians accumulate enemies.”
I am left with a perplexity, if the New Testament (and the rest of the Bible) is divinely inspired by a perfect divine God, why do we have so many different understandings of the Bible?