It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
High-fructose corn syrup is often singled out as Food Enemy No. 1 because it has become ubiquitous in processed foods over about the last 30 years – a period that coincides with a steep rise in obesity. One of the primary sources of HFCS in the American diet is soda – in fact, many public health advocates refer to soda as “liquid candy.”
That nickname is more apt than advocates realized, according to a study published online this month by the journal Obesity.
Researchers from the University of Southern California’s Keck School of Medicine went shopping in East Los Angeles and bought 23 cans and bottles of popular beverages. Then they sent them off to a laboratory in Massachusetts that used a technique called high-performance liquid chromatography to determine how much fructose, glucose and sucrose were in each sample. Each beverage was tested three times, and all samples were unlabeled.
The consumption of fructose, largely in the form of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), has risen over the past several decades and is thought to contribute negatively to metabolic health. However, the fructose content of foods and beverages produced with HFCS is not disclosed and estimates of fructose content are based on the common assumption that the HFCS used contains 55% fructose. The objective of this study was to conduct an objective laboratory analysis of the sugar content and composition in popular sugar-sweetened beverages with a particular focus on fructose content. Twenty-three sugar-sweetened beverages along with four standard solutions were analyzed for sugar profiles using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in an independent, certified laboratory. Total sugar content was calculated as well as percent fructose in the beverages that use HFCS as the sole source of fructose.
The study included a few other surprises:
* Mountain Dew had 13% less sugar than advertised on the label, and Dr. Pepper had 8% less.
* Tested samples of Mexican Coca-Cola – which is supposedly made with cane sugar instead of HFCS – contained no sucrose, only fructose and glucose in a 52%-to-48% ratio.
* 17% of the sweetener in Red Bull was fructose, even though sucrose and glucose are the only sweeteners listed on the label.
Originally posted by RelentlessLurker
i had no idea it was linked to Gout.
i also am getting the feeling that if one is a heavy drinker, they should avoid fructose at all costs?
Originally posted by SyphonX
Every heavy drinker I know, or anyone that simply "drinks socially" is also a soda drinker. They liberally sample both fountains, quite excessively. If it's not booze, it's 'liquid candy'.
Sadly, this is mostly my family or friends of the family that I know. My entire bloodline is predisposed to intense alcoholism. Many of my ancestors literally perished directly from alcoholism, be it cirrhosis of the liver by alcohol or by other direct means, fatalities under the influence.
So, suffice to say, as like many families these days, I have a first hand account to the destruction that alcohol inflicts on an entire family.
All that, kind of off-topic.. but it always struck me kind of strange that heavy drinkers were heavy soda drinkers. How many studies have their been on the negative affects on the liver from fructose/alcohol consumption? Some people literally chug soda by the gallon all day,and then pound back whiskey all night. This must be intense destruction on the liver? Not to mention a heavy 1, 2 punch for neurological diseases?edit on 27-10-2010 by SyphonX because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zeddissad2
I'm quite heavy drinker but I do not drink any soda: only water and teas. I usually do not drink spirits, only beer&vine. How is it with sugar/alcohol contained in beer?