New FOIA State Dept. Docs Reveal "Failed Pipeline Negotitations"- Bin Laden: 9/11 Inside Job

New FOIA State Dept. Docs Reveal "Failed Pipeline Negotitations" with Taliban- Bin Laden: 9/11 Inside Job

One of the recently released State Department documents, from March 2000, notes that a proposed “gas pipeline from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Multan, Pakistan figured prominently in discussions” about the mutual goal between the U.S. and regional players of stabilizing Afghanistan. Discussions on another proposed pipeline from Iran to India via Pakistan had also been proposed that were “more advanced”, and the Pakistanis had gone to Tehran to meet with Iranian officials “to pursue these negotiations”. But neither “pipeline is likely to go forward in the mid-term”, the documented concluded.

A Pakistani official told the U.S. that “Pakistan ‘will always support the Taliban’”. This “policy cannot change, he continued; it would prompt rebellion across the Northwest Frontier Provinces, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, and indeed on both sides of the Pashtun-dominated Pak-Afghan border.” But the Taliban were “‘looking for a way out’ of the problem with bin Laden”. The U.S. was urged to “find a way to compromise with the Taliban”, and possible “ways that the U.S. and the Taliban might use to break the impasse” were suggested, including “the possibility of a trial in a third (Muslim) country”, “U.S. assurances that bin Laden would not face the death penalty”, and “a U.S. outline of what the Taliban would gain from extradition of bin Laden”.[2]

Wow, how many more docs are going to surface that show that this whole thing in the middle east was totally contrived for oil profits and poppy production?

And Bin Laden was already suggesting 9/11 was an inside job on September 28, 2001, after flat out denying he had anything to do with the attacks on September 16, 2001:

In fact, as already noted, bin Laden had in denied any involvement in the attacks. On September 16, bin Laden issued a statement saying: “Following the latest explosions in the United States, some Americans are pointing the finger at me, but I deny that because I have not done it…. Reiterating once again, I say that I have not done it….” He added that the Taliban had forbidden terrorist attacks from being “carried out from Afghanistan’s territory”, and that this message had been delivered to him personally from Taliban leader Mullah Omar.[22]

Again on September 28, in an interview with the Karachi daily Ummat, bin Laden denied involvement: “I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. Neither I had any knowledge of these attacks nor I consider the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children, and other people…. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed.”

He went on to suggest that the attacks were an inside job: “Then there are intelligence agencies in the US, which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taliban and then this incident happened…. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United States? That secret government must be asked as to who made the attacks.”[23]

Problem. Reaction. Solution.

www.foreignpolicyjournal.com...

Good article worth reading. Debunkers, don't bother. We'd hate to have to hold you to the fact that the white papers promised to the world indicting Bin Laden for 9/11 have STILL never been delivered, to this day.



US officials deemed any request for evidence of Bin Laden committing 9/11 as unreasonable. Read the article. More damnation of the rogue cabal that has enslaved this once great nation.

I found a older story that might go with this ....peace
What Congress Does Not Know about Enron and 9/11

It is time for Congress to face the truth: In order to give Enron one last desperate chance to complete the Taliban pipeline and save itself from bankruptcy, senior levels of US intelligence were ordered to keep their eyes shut and their subordinates ignorant.


By Atty. John J. Loftus

First published May, 2003:


A captured Al Qaida document reveals that US energy companies were secretly negotiating with the Taliban to build a pipeline. The document was obtained by the FBI but was not allowed to be shared with other agencies in order to protect Enron. Multiple sources confirm that American law enforcement agencies were deliberately kept in the dark and systematically prevented from connecting the dots before 9/11 in order to aid Enron’s secret and immoral Taliban negotiations. source www.informationclearinghouse.info...

Great post. Star and flag from me.

Originally posted by the2ofusr1
Multiple sources confirm that American law enforcement agencies were deliberately kept in the dark and systematically prevented from connecting the dots before 9/11 in order to aid Enron’s secret and immoral Taliban negotiations. source www.informationclearinghouse.info...

Which would explain exactly why Able Danger was shut down. And it would also explain why all those documents in the DIA and in WTC 7 had to absolutely hit the pavement. Literally.

It's a rogue cabal of people in bed with the oil companies, insurance fraudsters, gold thefters, CIA drug runners, and the MIC. They all stood to profit from 9/11. And have. In a big way. They couldn't wait any longer, because there was no more "enemy" after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and military budgets were at risk.

But you're busted. Couldn't hide it forever. Not even the 30 years your little "National Security" classification details. Nope. So come on, let it all out now. How you planned the military exercises on 9/11 so the military would be caught off guard and the FAA confused- and how you planted explosives in the towers with your latest military explosive technology to cut key columns in the buildings forcing 3 collapses.

How you had to collaborate with Israel and AmDocs so all the phone calls could be monitored and you could stay one step ahead of detection. And oh, that was pretty slick how you took over the NTSB investigation of all the black boxes- and withheld the serail numbers so you could falsify that too. But good old Craig Ranke and P4T busted your chops on that one! HAHA! Thanks Craig!

No no. Your little world is going to be busted wide open. I wish it was your heads, but hey, I am just a little old nobody from nowhere important. I can't do anything. The power of public opinion and persistence will get you though in the end.

This is hardly new. Michael Moore reported in his Fahrenheit 9/11 flick years ago that back during the Clinton administration, Unocal was in negotiations with Taliban officials to build this very pipeline. What he doesn't say is that Unocal wouldn't touch the plan with a ten foot pole because Afghanistan was embroiled in a civil war even then and the whole country was too unstable for them to even consider it. That damned fool conspiracy web site youre getting this bit from is simply dusting this off and putting it in a new cover to make it look like they have access to secret internal information.

How much secret internal information can a bunch of college kids making internet flicks in their dorm room actually have, anyway?

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
How much secret internal information can a bunch of college kids making internet flicks in their dorm room actually have, anyway?

BS.

FOIA requests can be made by high school kids if they want. With the rash of new FOIA videos coming out, showing that critical witnesses to explosions have been intentionally edited out to conceal this testimony, not only from the public, but from the 9/11 Commission as well, this will only add to the incentive to file more FOIA's. And I am glad.

www.cbsnews.com...

news.bbc.co.uk...

archives.cnn.com...

news.bbc.co.uk...

news.bbc.co.uk...

in short

there can NEVER be a legitimate 9/11
investigation until the CIA has been
stripped of it's power and immunity.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
in short

there can NEVER be a legitimate 9/11
investigation until the CIA has been
stripped of it's power and immunity.

You'll have to add a long list others to that short list. Starting with the FBI. Cheney. Rumsfeld. Kissinger. Zelikow. All of them. And oh, don't forget to nuke Israel and the Vatican while you're at it. Thanks.

reply to post by TrueAmerican

in my humble opinion
I think ur adding too many names
to that list. being ignorant of what
your subordinates are doing is not
a crime. However, covering up
for them AFTER the fact IS.

The FBI had leads and tips
running out the ying yang,
but their cases were stopped
cuz it ran into the CIA's wall
of immunity. And later that
same wall came up around
the Oval Office.

Our constitution is set up to be a
system of checks and balances
on all 3 branches. When that
check is removed by immunity
to prosecution then you have
rogue government entities
doing whatever the hell they
wanna do. However, their
incentive is money which is
the biggest recruiting card
played by the CIA.

People who are loyal
to God and Country
join the Military.

people who are loyal
to greed, join the CIA.

Originally posted by TrueAmerican

BS.

FOIA requests can be made by high school kids if they want. With the rash of new FOIA videos coming out, showing that critical witnesses to explosions have been intentionally edited out to conceal this testimony, not only from the public, but from the 9/11 Commission as well, this will only add to the incentive to file more FOIA's. And I am glad.

"Critical information intentionally edited out" as in neglecting to mention Unocal dismissed the whole idea becuase the whole country was too much of a basket case to make the plan practical? Or do you mean "critical information intentionally edited out" as in neglecting to mention Michael Moore already milked it for what it was worth years ago so this "new FOIA state dept. docs" bit is really stale information being passed off as something new in the hopes that it can be milked all over again?

I would definitely say "Critical information intentionally edited out" includes neglecting to mention that no oil company on Earth will touch any such pipeline scheme becuase the pipeline would be blown up and destroyed on a daily basis. Don't you agree?

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
I would definitely say "Critical information intentionally edited out" includes neglecting to mention that no oil company on Earth will touch any such pipeline scheme because the pipeline would be blown up and destroyed on a daily basis. Don't you agree?

No not really
if you keep insurgents busy
avoiding drones and hid
in caves, they become irrelevant.

And the ones who get smart
to the idea get paid off with
blood money.

reply to post by TrueAmerican


You left out this bit:

According to the BBC, the Taliban later even warned the U.S. that bin Laden was going to launch an attack on American soil. Former Taliban foreign minister Wakil Ahmad Muttawakil said his warnings, issued because of concerns that the U.S. would react by waging war against Afghanistan, had been ignored. A U.S. official did not deny that such warnings were issued, but told BBC rather that it was dismissed because “We were hearing a lot of that kind of stuff”.[4]

Your own source.

If one reads the entire article, it is clear that the Taliban knew that bin Laden was a loose cannon, as dangerous to their own interests as he was to both the western powers and the Muslim world. It is well known that the Taliban were the creatures of the ISI and that American (and European) firms were negotiating for transit rights from Central Asia with them. Pakistan was playing a dangerous balancing game then, as they do today. Bin Laden knew that his stay in Afghanistan depended on the Taliban's ability to justify letting him stay, so naturally he would feign innocence when necessary. There is no question that the Bush administration jumped on 9/11 to justify implementing its policy of "regime change," which would then allow negotiations with a more pliable Afghan government, But that doesn't mean it was an "inside job" just because bin Laden said so to save his skin.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
No not really
if you keep insurgents busy
avoiding drones and hid
in caves, they become irrelevant.

And the ones who get smart
to the idea get paid off with
blood money.

If that's the case then the pipeline should have already been built. Where is it and where is all this oil pouring out of Afghanistan?