Trades Hall president Kevin Bracken calls 9/11 'conspiracy'

reply to post by tezzajw

Herald Sun is owned by NEWS CORP, Rupert Murdoch, FOX, whatever you want to call it.
It's no surprise they would shoot Mr. Bracken down.

He's also a friend of my Dad and thinks 9/11 was staged to help usher in the NWO.

I think he would have almost certainly read posts at this forum, and like I said I wouldn't be surprised if he's a member too.

Don't be dismayed at the way the media has painted you. It's not personal and it's only done to "serve as a message" to anyone else thinking about speaking out. It's unforunate the way things work.

Interesting to note that 70% of voters side with Mr. Bracken


Do you think Kevin Bracken's comments were reasonable?

Yes 65.18% (4505 votes)

No 34.82% (2400 votes)

Total votes: 6905

Just another example that more people are waking up, or majority supports the 'troofers'

reply to post by tezzajw


The Herald Sun is not really a newspaper. It is tabloid magazine that appeals to the lowest common denominator. If only the Bosses of other newspapers could admit that most people don't want to fold their paper 3 times just to read a single page... The other papers have their faults but at least they provide a more balanced and thought-provoking outlook.

reply to post by Dark Ghost


Yet despite all that, 65% of its readers that did the poll actually agree with Kevin.

reply to post by Nventual


The newspaper is the problem, not the people reading it.

reply to post by Dark Ghost


True, but I always thought the Herald Sun's demographic were, well, the sort of people who would buy into the official 9/11 story.

reply to post by Nventual


Being the highest selling paper means there will be a varied range of readers. Some people like the small design and summary of sport/commerce/opinion pieces. They are not that time consuming to read so even very intelligent people might still prefer it in terms of time/convenience. Also, the crossword/sudoku/quiz/world jumbler is designed well enough to do on-the-run (compared to other papers).

Anyway, it is the journalists/editors of the paper that are the problem. They allow absolute sensationalised nonsense to take up the front half of the paper while pushing important issues to the back. And yes I am also surprised at that poll result.