Merging lights, Moscow on October 19 2010

Originally posted by lunac

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by TasteTheTruth
S+F
Amazing!

Look what I noticed!

Remember this video?
www.youtube.com...
Go to 1:30 and compare with the other sightings.

Seems to me like the Golden Knights are doing quite a few jumps. LOL

edit on 10/19/2010 by TasteTheTruth because: put in snapshot of video

Yup!

Hmm! This remind me of Orion's belt

edit on 20-10-2010 by lunac because: (no reason given)

I've tried pointing this out several times in the ATS boards, foremost with the video I posted on the 13th, when the 'merging' happened in my backyard's sky. They're overhead different times of the day, and point different directions depending on where you're located, where the Earth is located, etc. Where I am they appear at around 3 am, but do not always merge/move. It all depends on perspective as well as atmospheric conditions, but they shouldn't be explained as anything other than Orion's belt.

reply to post by xerocint


What's interesting, is that I've read in the past that Humans could have possibly originated from Orion, in a seemingly 'far off' theory, but I really can't remember and specifics as to the origin of the claim.

With that being said, I also dispute the significance of the 'triangular formation' in the video, as the third craft was just moving away from the others. If they held the formation, I'd say it was noteworthy, however they didnt.

If this was real how does this guy have an HD camera so ready and so quick. I'm sure it was a UFO to him. To some it's just another video that could of been hashed.

WoW I've been watching this same thing all night long... this is deffinately real, I can see it as I'm typing this

reply to post by boondock-saint


and there NO way those lights on their suits are going to show up MILES away .. so .. yea... but good try )

Thats cool

Quick discussion on lights and illumination (and luminaries)... Video can only provide us "temporal" information .. location, velocity, duration, date, geometry, color and intensity (and changes there within). A video is incapable of shedding light (pardon the pun) on the actual composition of what ever it is generating or reflecting incident illumination.

Without over-indulging the patience of the good reader allow me to suggest the following potentially fertile avenues of investigation .. in effect enumerate on necessary tools in the forensic kit-bag of every self-respecting UFO hunter - worth his or her pinch of crash debris.

First off: A polarizer. Place a polarizer (or two) in the optic path and rotate them with respect to one another...See what sort of an effect this has on the image (may have to increase the gain as the polarizer necessarily cuts the incident energy - landing on the camera sensor - in half). Conducting this quick test allows one to assess the degree of polarization (or lack thereof) of the incoming light. A flare source (any chemical ignition source) would remain unaltered under various rotations of the polarizer pair. Unusual light sources might well respond in a specific manner to the P-test - this allows us to assess the degree of polarization. It's certainly a viable forensic finding. I see application in assessing high-altitude aircraft reflections as reported with the Chemtrail phenomenon. Sunshine as reflected off metallic surfaces (glare) adopts polarization i.e. becomes highly polarized. So twisting or introducing a polarizer into the optic path will support or categorically discount the garden-variety glare slash glint hypothesis/explanation. It can be rather dramatic the high-altitude glint - so it's important to be able to nicely pin it down - as just that - glare.

How about conducting spectrographic analysis of various flare-type phenomenon? Do an image search for CCD spectroscopy or read up on home-made spectrometer here IceInSpace Spectroscopy Intro (might skip to the bottom re: testing and reference light sources) And here - some additional DIY optics articles - good stuff!

Meteoritic fireball spectra have been captured and analysed to reveal the composition of the incoming bolide .. I can see the parallels (pardon the pun). And finally this link for real Do It Yourselfers (employing a discarded CD as a convenient diffraction grating.) And allow me to introduce a quick technical point. It's important to have a reference light source (of known composition) .. have a small pixie-style neon bulb and via thin fibre-optic cable introduce this calibration source into the business end of things i.e. into the diffraction slit (or grating). Rather clever high-tech/lo-tech use of fibre-optic feed cable. IMO

These techniques could all be applied to the mysterious re-occurring Marfa or Brown Hill or Paulding lights. Youtube these - is my suggestion. There was an attempt at just this very thing re: Marfa Lights +Spectroscopy < fertile link - this one. Thumbs up! Trust this all as reasonable and well-received. Thanks for sharing in this. Keep up the good work everybody. Together we can crack these historically rather tough-to-crack "mystery walnuts".

Originally posted by 0ne10
Those are aircraft which happen to be flying the same vector route. They don't "merge", one is just flying behind the other.

Here is a video of aircraft:

Notice that the jets in the above video also make a triangle..

So, just like everyone else is doing, I guess we can say the lights in NY and Texas and Moscow are jets because they all make a triangle.

No.. the video above shows jets. The El Paso sighting was the Golden Knights. The NY sighting were balloons. And this sighting is most probably aircraft. Three points make triangles... triangles are primitive shapes that happen naturally with three points....

Stop trying to compare everything that has three points, please. Think people, think.

edit on 19-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)

I'm going to have to agree with you here. They're not merging but flying the same route. I totally believe in UFO's but these look like planes taking off. The way the lights flash look like planes. As for the different colors, I think the camera has a lot to do with that.
Pretty cool, nonetheless.