It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Contrary to common belief, the word "jihad" does not necessarily imply any violent effort, let alone "war" and such instances of extreme violence. It is a general term that can mean violent as well as peaceful actions, depending on the context in which it is used, as we shall indeed see later. Similarly, "jihad" as a generic word can be used even when the sought goals are not Islamic, i.e. in non-religious contexts.
Originally posted by Daniyal
reply to post by Signals
Your right, why? Because I cannot do with this kinda of media, I, try to do as much as I can, but it's never enough, along with many other moderate muslims, we try to get the media's attention, but they are craving some suicide bomber, or nuclear program, they can't seem to see that we wan't to give positive messages but they keep denying us, but my motivation won't let me stop that. Any media that does listen will be some small paper that will put it somewhere in the middle like it doesn't matter.
Originally posted by Daniyal
So whats up with this Jihad holy war? Well... Jihad, holy war, fighting, Jihad has almost nothing to do with "holy war" or whatever they call it... It's sad that people think that Islam encourages holy war against all non-muslims when it is nothing of that meaning, and the people who go about this, the terrorists are uneducated, imbesolic people who have taken the preferances of Islam, in the beauty it is, and turned it into a large lie, fraud, etc.