It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Again, you are locked in binary thinking.
One can say that missing one thread is possible, but when it happens consistently, then a pattern emerges and it is no longer a strawman
Regarding your question about the Heflin case being a "sacred cow" of UFOlogy, out of the thousands and thousands of UFO reports, the Heflin case ranked #62 in the top 100 UFO cases compiled by our friend Isaac Koi:
Please explain..
Originally posted by zorgon
Well yes that is a 'loose interpretation' and might be valid except that the sacred cow was referring to the spaceman that we said we never even heard of
The Heflin photos are one of Ufology's "sacred cows" and the images are believed by some to be definitive.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Heflin never saw any spaceman, did he?
And the OP article didn't refer to the spaceman case as a "sacred cow", did it?
What I hear from a lot of those we call skeptic is that we need to get more scientific studies, to be taken seriously. But when those scientific approaches are used... those making the demands don't even show up in the thread.
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Journal of Scientific Exploration and NARCAP (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena) are two organisations that don't get enough attention.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Kandinsky
Journal of Scientific Exploration and NARCAP (National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena) are two organisations that don't get enough attention.
And it will be up to us to present that because some factions will prefer those reports stay in Mulder's basement
Originally posted by neformore
Aren't these the same people who claimed that the Lonnie Zamora case was fake?
They seem to go an awfully long way into trying to dismiss certain UFO cases.