It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacemanjupiter
Progeria isn't a good enough explanation. There has been a lot of good work on this and you'd realize that if you did some research. There is no denying that something isn't right here, and it isn't disease or deformation.
I'll look more into. I haven't read up on it so I wanted to know what people thought. I've only seen a few threads here on it every once in a while like you said.
Care to address the things he said in the video though? I know you might dislike him but are his claims false about the 'teeth' and other things he says?
And I would also think that Progeria would be something easily identifiable by testing.
If he's holding on to a Progeria sufferers Skull then it would be ridiculous.
It is my belief that he really wants to prove what he claims, and with the results of the required tests, he will succeed. I appreciate you sharing this, in spite of the ones who come here to discredit the subject. Not everyone will agree on all subjects, just do your best to look at all angles and go with what you believe, as ultimately, that's all that really counts.
Originally posted by WWu777
I just saw this presentation by Lloyd Pye about intervention theory. It's really good and got me thinking.
YouTube - Human Origins : Intervention Theory by Lloyd Pye 1/8
His interview on Coast to Coast was very informative too. He explains in it why the Starchild's DNA is not human.
YouTube - Starchild Skull and Hominoids 1 of 12
Btw, Lloyd recently wrote some lengthy rebuttals to the Wikipedia and Steven Novella hit pieces on him. You can check them out here:
Lloyd Pye Wacks Wikipedia
Lloyd Pye vs Novella