reply to post by LordBucket
I personally agree with you mate, it's not the first time it's happened and won't be the last.
Yes it is a movie and of course people should go out and enjoy the film so the comments of "It's just a movie" are partly justified.
I have a thread going that touches on this matter so I won't bring it up
HOWEVER, this is not the only film with a subtle racist agenda.
I enjoyed 28 Days Later a lot - British film, good performances etc.
Yet there was a fair element subliminal racism in that film.
All the soldiers (white) were, bar an Irish one, English and portrayed as borderline psychotic rapists under the flimsy reasoning of they were near
suicidal without any women around. What loud of tosh!
The three survivors at the (good) ending are the protagonists. Two are adults, one is black and one is white Scottish along with a young kid who is
white English.
It seemed telling to me that there was a mixed-race message on that note.
Yes, just a film, but are we, on ATS, to deny ignorance of these 'messages' being inserted into them?
My view is that the people who write these films are very intelligent, clever and understand what the agenda is.
They can create films (storys) that suit the elites agenda and make a lot of money from it. The elites then have the production company's casting
people finish off the formulae for a movie that will sell while advancing the agenda of one world race.
In a way you shouldn't let it bother you too much as the commercial film industry likes to do this.
At the same time it's a very subtle and noticeable 'F**K You' to people who are of white racial ethnic ancestry from the ptb.