Professor Emeritus Hal Lewis Resigns From APS Over Climategate

Professor Emeritus Hal Lewis Resigns From APS Over Climategate

thegwpf.org

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS...

(visit the link for the full news article)

Dr. Lewis slams the American Physical Society in this scathing critique of the scientific fraud being perpetrated against the American public at the hands of state funded scientists.

Fresh from the GWPF, Dr. Lewis’s resignation letter is laid bare for all to read.

Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President's Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making)

thegwpf.org
(visit the link for the full news article)

He says there are trillions of dollars at stake. Millions is easy to believe, billions isn't hard to believe, but trillions?

Anyway it's pretty bad press for APS for this resignation to be worded so strongly that APS is not fulfilling it's mission statement and using the word "incontrovertible" even though he claims nobody really agreed with the use of that word.

reply to post by Arbitrageur


yes trillions think about cap and tax or cap and trade the millions and billions and trillons of lost dollars retooling the entire world production capability of products and services not only to mention the added cost for you paying for food and electricity....................yeah man it is all about the benjamins so to speak...you are speaking world wide

Trillions is a lot of money!!!!!

Originally posted by Arbitrageur
He says there are trillions of dollars at stake. Millions is easy to believe, billions isn't hard to believe, but trillions?

Anyway it's pretty bad press for APS for this resignation to be worded so strongly that APS is not fulfilling it's mission statement and using the word "incontrovertible" even though he claims nobody really agreed with the use of that word.

There's probably quadrillions at stake.

If global carbon taxes are implemented to fund a world government, the entire productivity of the world is at stake.

reply to post by mnemeth1


Heh, why stop an unprecedented gravy train?

Now for sure the scheme goes farther back than 1995, but this is a good filler in....

The tawdry tale of the top two global warming gurus in the business world goes all the way back to Earth Day, April 17, 1995 when the future author of “An Inconvenient Truth” travelled to Fall River, Massachusetts, to deliver a green sermon at the headquarters of Molten Metal Technology Inc. (MMTI). MMTI was a firm that proclaimed to have invented a process for recycling metals from waste. Gore praised the Molten Metal firm as a pioneer in the kind of innovative technology that can save the environment, and make money for investors at the same time.

“Gore left a few facts out of his speech that day,” wrote EIR. “First, the firm was run by Strong and a group of Gore intimates, including Peter Knight, the firm’s registered lobbyist, and Gore’s former top Senate aide.”

(Fast-forward to the present day and ask yourself why it is that every time someone picks up another Senate rock, another serpent comes slithering out).

Second, the company had received more than $25 million in U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research and development grants, but had failed to prove that the technology worked on a commercial scale. The company would go on to receive another $8 million in federal taxpayers’ cash, at that point, its only source of revenue

cypress times