It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What I believe is proof of ets on earth -

page: 12
37
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2010 @ 12:39 AM
link   
reply to post by spacekc929
 


But why not? If you compare so-called abduction stories happening out in the middle of nowhere wouldn;t Ancient Earth, literally be a middle of nowhere?

Therefore what would stop Aliens from coming down and interacting?

I think a lot of people find the Ancient Astronaut Theory to be very Sci-Fi, and that all the Gods in text books, must of been the Aliens.

Why couldn't there be other worldly visitors and Gods? With the age of the Universe what is the difference of 6000 years in Interstellar Travel?

I mean there used to be Dinosaurs, and strange plants, and sea creatures, the World used to be a different place, so I don't see why any of the material presented in any of the Ancient Alien and Astronaut threads give slightliest inkling of an idea, that Aliens could have visited us in the Past.

Even besides the mainstream wonders of the World, and places of Ancient Astronaut interest there are many small tribes from North America and the Amazons and the Pacific that also followed the stars, and detailed mythology of the Stars.

No one knows for sure. How can you know for sure?



posted on Oct, 11 2010 @ 07:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by DoomsdayRex

Originally posted by rusethorcain
Ah duh...I think it means that you don't know.


Right. Then why do you believe that something, in these case supposed archaeological mysteries, are explained by virtue of they're being unexplained?



Because I have taken these (apparently impossible by human means) achievements into consideration together with a large amount of other types of evidence including photographic and eyewitnesses accounts from hundreds of reliable witness and come to the conclusion on my own these paintings and sculptures actually represent what they appear to represent, spacecraft, astronauts and other worldly beings.

You don't see it.
I get it.
So, what's your point?
If you are trying to call me stupid for believing as I do then do it and be off.
Stop slithering around the urge to do so like a snake.

You do not appear to have the gumption to conclude anything by yourself except what you are told by someone else as fact.
If I lived my life like that, only believing what other people told me, I would be dead already.



posted on Oct, 11 2010 @ 08:47 AM
link   
I definately believe ET's have been visiting us for tens of thousands of years, possibly millions. They were here before the flood, and are the source of many cultures creation stories/mythology. But...this is my conclusion only after much research that i believe points to this as the inevitable answer. I still dont consider it fact or "proof", rather very convincing evidence. Until the people that are hoarding sacred knowledge make that knowledge public, we may never prove this theory.



posted on Oct, 11 2010 @ 10:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by rusethorcain
Because I have taken these (apparently impossible by human means) achievements into consideration...


But how do you know they were impossible?


Originally posted by rusethorcain
together with a large amount of other types of evidence including photographic and eyewitnesses accounts...


And how do you know these are connected?


Originally posted by rusethorcain
So, what's your point?


That the evidence you are using is either not the best available or not connected in the first place.


Originally posted by rusethorcain
If you are trying to call me stupid for believing as I do then do it and be off.


No one here is calling you stupid. You are projecting your own prejudices on me.


Originally posted by rusethorcain
You do not appear to have the gumption to conclude anything by yourself except what you are told by someone else as fact.


Again, you are projecting. You have not considered any archaeological, anthropological or historical source. You are simply going on what books and programs about ancient astronauts tell you about those sources.



posted on Oct, 13 2010 @ 07:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by daluniverse
okay look at this

you can clearly make out helicopter, tank, submarine etc

now the skeptical explanation is `these markings were caused by water erosion over time`

give me a break

its very obvious that somebody at that time saw those things and drew them down!


Ah, you're new to all of this aren't you? It's nothing to do with water erosion, it's where the original stone has pieces over written. This is covered extensively on many links with ATS, searching for Abydos may help. Do you know find it even the slightest bit interesting that you see those shapes as they look very much like vehicles of the 20th/early 21st century? Do you think that is the tech the ETs would have had?



posted on Oct, 13 2010 @ 12:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by daluniverse
btw quick question why are all pharos depicted with a weird curvy stick as a beard

take king tut for instance

he was just a boy, how would he have a long beard?




ROFL, LOL...... hold on, let me get back on my chair. You really mean that don't you? All your research has led you to ask that question has it? You know one of the Pharoes was a lady and she is also depicted with this beard don't you? I'm starting to think you are doing this as a parody - at least I hope so.



posted on Oct, 14 2010 @ 12:35 PM
link   
reply to post by daluniverse
 


you feel good about yourself then? Where's my 100 percent proof? No-where? thought so.

Stop posting mindless threads like this, it's a waste of space and peoples time.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


ET is the only possibility which ties up all the lose ends and does not make liars out of many credible and respectable witnesses who claim to have seen...not UFO's but identified ET (or inner earth) craft.
It is the only answer that accounts for and makes sense of all the unexplained factors in the equation at the same time.

You seem to be suffering from the opinion ET life is impossible.

What makes you think that?

How is it possible...that ET are impossible?
This is a limitation in your thinking probably embedded by a firm and resolute religious belief.

Well good for you, however let me be the first to enlighten you...religion and ET are not mutually exclusive.

ET in fact goes a long way to explains religion.
Religion goes a long way to explain ET.
Ever heard of "angels?"

You don't HAVE to believe it though.
Nobody is twisting your arm (or your mind) behind your back.
Just trying to pry open a tightly closed little box.



posted on Oct, 15 2010 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by awake_and_aware
reply to post by daluniverse
 


you feel good about yourself then? Where's my 100 percent proof? No-where? thought so.

Stop posting mindless threads like this, it's a waste of space and peoples time.



Just so you are aware - This ain't Soldier of Fortune or Jane. You are on a website dedicated to conspiracies and the genuine possibility, or probability that ET exists. 100% proof? We don't even have 100% proof we are here. 90% of particuli (or atomic particles) is empty space.
Seems by your insensitive and imbecilic request above you are just trolling here in a pitiful attempt to validate or lend credence to your narrow viewpoint and limited thinking.

I don't see the credibility...No-where.


edit on 15-10-2010 by rusethorcain because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 09:16 AM
link   
reply to post by rusethorcain
 


Funnily enough, no one sees the credibility in this thread. Saying 90% of the universe is "empty space" bears no conviction to your attempt to condecend my view points. I believe you are talking about Dark Matter anyway.

There is no evidence is this thread, just another speculative attempt to create attention and spread misinformation.

When pictures, organisations, videos, artifacts are presented i'll be just a little more interested.

STS-75 is the most interesting thing i've seen so far. This is just awful though.



posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by awake_and_aware
 


I can respect that. Point taken.

Now I see why people write "2nd line" on their posts.
I was going to ask....then I got the violation notice.



posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Alien have visited earth for a long time. Even if some people deny it. It is truth, and will be truth. Now, alien come to give of knowledge of the truth. Alien exist, and have come to Earth. That is all.


Inverencial peace



posted on Oct, 24 2010 @ 03:51 PM
link   
Alien have visited earth for a long time. Even if some people deny it. It is truth, and will be truth. Now, alien come to give of knowledge of the truth. Alien exist, and have come to Earth. That is all.


Inverencial peace



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by rusethorcain
 


Oh fair enough, lets start some more lies up in some other threads and claim it as truth without sufficient evidence.

Sorry for the bitterness, there's just too much of this stuff floating about on ATS, it's actually harder to find people with credible accounts with evidence to back it up.
edit on 26/10/10 by awake_and_aware because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 02:59 PM
link   
reply to post by awake_and_aware
 


Look, if the possibility of extraterrestrial life was zero, I would still have difficulty accounting for the absolutely certain and credible sightings by astronauts and other reliable reports which have not been explained away.
All of a sudden I would have to accept some sort of mass hypnosis that strikes randomly, a malfunctioning brain or deliberate subconscious programming that has affected all of them. Maybe microwaves from the center of the earth or something?
That they saw what they say they saw is infinitely more likely and believable than any of those, or your possibilities.

The fact that it isn't impossible makes these already credible reports only that much more credible.
Adding credence and upping probability.
You are not skeptical - you are certain.
You are immovable... and speaking as if all of this is an impossibility.
Where do you get such ideas and why would you imagine those limited considerations and personal beliefs represent the end of rational discussion?

Do you know something the rest of us don't?

Tell me ET craft is impossible. I will say you are the liar here. .
Because you have never seen it?
Because you think it is impossible?
If you were a scientist, and could multiply yourself by a few hundred thousand, maybe, just maybe I would consider what you say as possibly holding some truth.
As is... I can't do that.



edit on 26-10-2010 by rusethorcain because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 26 2010 @ 03:23 PM
link   
I disagree.

I could leave it at that but I'm waaaaay to arrogant to just leave it at that. The reason so many say 'froma bove is because it was the only place they didn't know and humans search reasons for anything they can't explain like 'the reason of life' and the whole 'life and death' issue and since the sky was the only unknown everything comes fromt he sky.Many people worship things like the sun, the moon or the rain and they come from the sky, so anything devine must come from the sky as well. Doesn't really mean that something actually came from the sky. I can garantee you nutting came from the sky the last 15.000 human years even thou i can't back up my claim.

Reptillian life? I hear that a lot yet seen little proof of it being here. It does exist, somewhere else in many forms but Earth is a boring backwater planet. if it wasn't I wouln't be here, but I guess that to is an unprovable issue not to mention an unimportant one.

I could continue hee with something like quadhelix DNA strains, their origin, use and disuse and the pro's and cons. But since the topic really doesn't go over that I will leave it like it is right now.



new topics

top topics



 
37
<< 9  10  11   >>

log in

join