wow! lots of creepy ghost pictures

on james gilland website, his friend master kan who is a well known healer and teacher of meditation, caught on camera a ton of weird ghost like images during his meditiation
a couple of them are drawings but most of them are really spooky
must watch!

mod please close this thread nobody is replying to it

Give it more than 20 minutes

I can't view youtube at work so there isn't much for me to comment on.

reply to post by daluniverse


Dude relax man,, 20 minutes is way to short of a time to start getting tore up that no one is commenting on ya vid.
That ws a cool vid, The part with the rainbow meditation (if true) is to cool for words.

reply to post by daluniverse


Nice music !

Woody

Cool video. I wish they gvave more of a perspective of where the first few photos were taken. The meditation pics were also interesting, but at the shutter setting they set up all that guy would need to do is move around or jump while photos are being taken and they will turn out that way. I believe James does have some amazing stuff going on out there in Washington. I hope ATS will make it out there again soon.

The video is interesting, and the music is calming. Unfortunately, I can't really say I buy into the photographic evidence. There's no context with which to judge the size, or location, of any of these spiritual energy images.

One of the Virgin Mary photos—the second I believe—looks like it's just a blurred, or low-resolution, photo taken of a part of a painting.

The rainbow meditation photos look interesting, but, you can achieve the same effect by snapping a photo mid-motion. I've done it before for college classes.

Sorry, I'm all for spiritual things, but, nothing from this video impresses me, nor does any of it strike me as photographic examples of what it claims to be.

~ Wandering Scribe

reply to post by daluniverse


Ghosts can be explained in amanner of ways apart from denial. they exist as i have witnessed 1 first hand.

Those who deny them are not intuitive enough, fearful or naive/ignorant.

Ghosts can be dangerous but to most of us they pose no danger. Enlightenment will bring true answers

Ghosts can be explained in [a manner] of ways apart from denial

Out of curiosity, where in this thread has anyone denied the existence of ghosts? From reading the responses on here everyone believes that ghosts, and spiritual beings, are existent. Some of us just have a little trouble accepting the particular photographic 'evidence' we've been presented with.

they exist as i have witnessed 1 first hand

It is unfortunate that first-hand memory is not a scientific qualification for legitimacy. Memory can chance the day of the week, the color of a shirt, even the location that an event happened. I have no problem believing you've seen a ghost. Unfortunately, I also have no problem believing that millions of people falsely remember seeing a ghost, or, that they just plain fabricated 'memories' of having seen ghosts.

Those who deny them are not intuitive enough

This is hardly true. I am quite intuitive. But I also know how to discern, use reasoning, and rationality. Not every ghost case is going to be genuine. There are frauds, con artists, hoaxers, and scum-bags who like to prey upon those of us who do believe in these things by making false reports and cases about them.


If you watch the video with an unbiased eye, as I did, you will notice that the photos are poorly cropped; the images are zoomed in, or out, poorly which reduces clarity; and you will see that in all of them no non-ghost context is visible to judge size, shape, solidity, or the reality of what is being photographed.

Surely if an apparition of the Virgin Mary showed up someone would have taken a long-range photograph of it!

Just something to think about of course.

reply to post by Wandering Scribe


Scientific wstudies show although not definitively that our memory is not photographic and that in fact chimpanzees are much closer than humans to having a photographic memory.

www.youtube.com...

I agree many people confabulate when attempting to remember events even a short time in the past, but when people who are sane and not sleep deprived or high and have ghostly experiences although the detail will fade with time will know what they saw was not human or can be falsified as common phenomenon.

I agree whole heartedly that the vast majority of 'evidence' is far from. There is a distinct lack of quantitative or qualitative data and only have my belief due to what I knew I saw at the time as was terrified half to death and as a result had to move house

Me saying that intuition plays a part was an error as many intellectual, wise and intuitive people do not believe in ghosts and i do not blame them as I was a sceptic until my encounter. I

I also agree many mediums are frauds as with everything in life with consumer capitalism the easy buck/pound is too much of a lure for many people and fleece the unsuspecting but these people in my humble opinion detract from the truth that there is a glorious afterlife where entities exist at atomic level or in spirit or through consciousness.