Which One Is The Comet – Which One Is The Asteroid?

NASA would have us believe that comets are dirty snowballs.

Supposedly they melt when they get close to the Sun.

If this is the case, it should be obvious which one is the snowball and which one is the rock.

Of course, it is not obvious.

It is not obvious because the dirty snowball theory is a bunch of crackpottery.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/092d95e90a31.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f3c9bf9243bd.jpg[/atsimg]

The ESA’s latest comet hunting probe has conducted a close flyby of an asteroid. One of the images above is from the Rosetta probe, which took pictures of asteroid Lutetia as it passed by. The other is from comet Temple 1, taken by the Deep Impact probe.

If you want to learn more about the incessant lies spewed out by the statist fraudsters you call the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, look here.

reply to post by mnemeth1


The one on top because it looks to be of a more frozen composition..
2nd

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

The one on top because it looks to be of a more frozen composition..
2nd

The one on top is the rock.

The one on the bottom is also a rock.

Because comets are made out of rock. - solid rock.

Your not really arguing with anyone here.
Even wikipedia agrees with you

Comets are distinguished from asteroids by the presence of a coma or a tail. However, extinct comets that have passed close to the Sun many times have lost nearly all of their volatile ices and dust and may come to resemble small asteroids

wiki

Originally posted by davespanners
Your not really arguing with anyone here.
Even wikipedia agrees with you

Comets are distinguished from asteroids by the presence of a coma or a tail. However, extinct comets that have passed close to the Sun many times have lost nearly all of their volatile ices and dust and may come to resemble small asteroids

wiki

Little problem with that.

Tempel 1 is an active comet.

Here's what its coma looks like:

www.utahskies.org...

reply to post by mnemeth1


But doesn't that only happen when it's passing close to a heat source?

I don't really know what I expected a comet to look like, I never really assumed it would look like some kind of winter wonderland Christmas card covered with snow so I guess I didn't get the point of the OP
I don't know
I am backed up on my cometology studies

Originally posted by davespanners
reply to post by mnemeth1

 

But doesn't that only happen when it's passing close to a heat source?

I don't really know what I expected a comet to look like, I never really assumed it would look like some kind of winter wonderland Christmas card covered with snow so I guess I didn't get the point of the OP
I don't know
I am backed up on my cometology studies

Comets have been observed to discharge at distances too far from the Sun to be attributed to sublimating ice.

So, to answer your question, it is not necessary for a comet to melt in order for it to discharge.

Its not necessary because there is no melting - period - on any comet.

Comets discharge a plasma coma due to the rapidly changing electrical environment they are moving through. The discharge is a result of charge equalization.

How was the conclusion that comets were made of rocks and ice come to in the first place?

Is This Nasa page about actual samples being taken from comets not true?

Originally posted by davespanners
How was the conclusion that comets were made of rocks and ice come to in the first place?

Is This Nasa page about actual samples being taken from comets not true?

No, it's absolutely true.

So true in fact, that the statist liars are having a hard time explaining the results.

You see, the particles found can only be formed by intense heat. Heat that no comet should have undergone according to the standard theory.

Such particulate heating is expected in the electric model.

reply to post by mnemeth1


Lol I agree are you insinuating that there is some conspiracy in the way these objects are named?
2nd

reply to post by mnemeth1


It's interesting stuff, but I don't really know enough about it to be able to contribute much..
I will do some reading of your links!

Originally posted by mnemeth1

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/092d95e90a31.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f3c9bf9243bd.jpg[/atsimg]

The 2nd image looks like its been censored - I'm starting to believe a lot of these "things", moons included are vessels or ships for ETs..

There are a lot of confused people when listening to the standard science.

The repulsion of a comet’s tail by the sun. The head of a comet and its tail are charged under a great potential difference, accounting for the manifest repulsion of the tail and attraction of the head.

Thats item 8. but there are some more interesting comments:
here

reply to post by mnemeth1

The comet is the one with the low electrical potential. Theoretically bodies with low electrical potential come form the outer solar system where they lose charge over time. Bodies with high electrical potential are found closer to the Sun, the source of this electrical charge.

So following this theory either one could be a comet, all that we would have to do is drain its electrical charge by throwing it out into the Kuiper belt or the Oort cloud for awhile.

reply to post by Devino


Right on dude.

Glad to see someone gets it.

Very interesting and simplifying explanation. Don't have anything to contribute, just wanted to be able to find this thread again.