posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 09:55 PM
Even if, as you propose, one looks through utilitarian glasses; the cost of financing the war and its aftermath is far too great to rationalise and
might not necessarily be covered by the opportunity income (the result of winning this 'oil currency war'). Also, oil is a dying fuel - rather than
fight for scraps, isn't it more worthwhile or to invest in newer, more efficient fuels? It seems more like a continuation of the expansion of the
US' sphere of influence than anything else, especially in light of the region (which remains fairly independent from the US economically and
culturally). Doesn't really seem like too much of an argument, whilst the US or NWO may indeed have played a hand in the tragic events of 9/11, there
is not enough evidence at all to state such objectively. Also, the motivation for doing so would most likely have been the aforementioned expansion of
the US' sphere of influence rather than the redistribution of wealth.
Governments don't always do whats best for the people. Sometimes (rarely) they do what they think is best, but even that misses the mark. When a
collective organisation of people is secretive, one assumes that they have something to hide. Hence, if the NWO globalist agenda does in fact exist
and does govern the world on a global scale (or desire to) it seems as if they are aware that their agenda would most likely upset a great deal of
people!