The Guantanamo Guidebook
Have you ever asked yourself, what exactly did they do at guantanamo? How about a experiment recorded that shows what they did (or at least what could
be shown on tv)? I think this should be required viewing for all Americans, and anyone who condones 'interrogation tactics' used by the army in
guantanamo and detention centers like it.
Warning the videos you are about to see is NSFW (Not Suitable For Work) and there is some nudity.
video.google.co.uk...#
A couple questions:
1. Have you seen this documentary before?
2. Do you feel the interrogation techniques are justifiable?
3. Do you think this type of detention facility would lead to good intel?
I feel very saddened by this
I know there is more to the story than this experiment, but the use of these techniques in order to defend democracy
.... wow.
I know, even this situation, is not black and white, and I don't blame everyone working in that place, that would be using very broad strokes but
those who were involved in torturing another person should be held responsible for there actions. A quote from someone who apparently worked there
said, during the time he was there, needs were met, no-one was tortured and people were not sent back to there countries because they would be
executed.
As I said its not black and white, or highly unlikely to be black and white. There are, (I feel,) guilty parties among some detainees in committing
terrorism or co-operating with terrorists, and soldiers who tortured people, physically or psychologically (which lead some detainees to commit
suicide) .. both fall under the same category in my view.
These men should have been tried under the law, and evidence gathered, but then how do we get intelligence? well the techniques that were used would
have unlikely to lead to reliable testimonies.
en.wikipedia.org...
On one hand, confessions obtained under torture have often been considered as not objective enough, since the use of such means may lead to
the suspect in confessing anything. On the other hand, even without torture, various cases of avered false confessions demonstrate that, in itself,
one man's confession is not a sufficient proof. False memory (including memory biases, etc.) or privileges granted under plea bargaining might lead to
such false confessions.
en.wikipedia.org...(law)
Evidence, reasons for them being were they were, other witness testimonies if possible, documentary evidence (such as passports, or other
documentation), psychological analysis, among other acceptable tools should be and have been used.
Are there other places being run like this? I don't know, have not checked it out yet, if anyone does please let me know.
I'd like to end by saying, in these situations, it is tough to decide what to do, but upholding freedom, human rights, democracy and responsible use
of the law, should always be on the top of the list and no one said that would be easy. I don't have the answers, but striving to be better is what
will stop us from turning into that which we fear.
Peace and Good Luck.
edit on 2-10-2010 by GoodLuckCharm because: (no reason given)