It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kloejen
Dave!
I just put your own video up against you. You have still not answered any of my questions, yet you poor out the same OS garbage to hang on to, so we might miss the big picture?
So WTC7 collapsed due to fire, and or fire/wtc1+2 damage ?
HOW could this happen in (almost) FREE( 98,8%) fall ?
Was there noting in the building to resist a free fall collapse?
Did'nt people work there ?
Originally posted by dereks
A truther repeating a lie... where have we seen that before!
Yes, just look at WTC 7
So when did they have the time to set WTC 7 up for demolition, and no one working there noticed?
What unsubstantiated damage... you are ignoring the bulge that was so bad firefighters put a transit on it, and knew the building would collapse so they pulled all the firefighters out of the area!
So again you have nothing at all.
This feat requires such skill that only a handful of demolition companies in the world will attempt it.
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by ANOK
" Is this what you guys are all about, trying to keep anything that could work in court quiet? You are all getting pretty angry and desperate over my WTC 7 claims. "
Pretty poor attempt at twisting words again . Seems like you practice this alot , too bad you haven't mastered it to the point of being effective .
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by ANOK
" OK I admit it, now what? "
Now , help me out here , you admit that the firefighters put a transit on the building , because it was creeping and they wanted to measure the creep .
Do you realize that you are admitting that the building was in danger of collapsing ?
And yet , you STILL insist it was a controlled demolition !
Talk about confused ...
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by ANOK
" The outer sections of a building, or any part of a building, does not need any other part of the building for support. "
Hang on , , just a minute , .
Originally posted by ANOK
That is not an indication that WTC 7 would collapse into its own footprint. There is NO evidence whatsoever that there was ANY compromising damage to WTC that would cause it to collapse into its own footprint.
Originally posted by slugger9787
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave, you are an educated man, from all indications of your command of the English language.
I presume that you can read between 600-1200 words per minuts.
Please open these threads, related to WTC7, and offer me your imput, insight and intelligence of the evidence presented therein.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
the penthouse collapsed down inside the structure while the outside structure remained standing for several seconds, before the entire structure fell. This proves the inside structure collapsed before the outside structure, and there isn't a controlled demolitions job on the planet that ever demolished a structure inside out.
Originally posted by wirefly
Funny, you sound so sure of yourself, yet, with all due respect, you obviously have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
They do it ALL OF THE TIME!!!
They blow the interior first to pull the rest of the building inward or at least not allow it to push the outter structure outward onto nearby properties. Sometimes, in cases where the horizontal members are insufficient, they tie the exterior walls to the interior columns with heavy cable for the very pupose of pulling inward by letting the interior structure pull as it goes down first.