It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by torsion
Originally posted by theMegaladon
...Clifford Stone? Because he does not have physical proof? He has cabinets full of documents he does not claim he has empirical evidence. ATS has him in the media portal so there is some credence there.
Weren't those alleged "documents" going to be put in the public domain? Or did Stone's invisible alien friend Korona talk him out of releasing them?
Putting Stone in the category with Escamilla is pretty low even for a skeptic. As for Sereda the guy is actually not that bad either. You could have put many other charlatans in there with Escamilla like his partner in crime Jamie Maussan. Maybe that nut at ECETI James Gilliand but Clifford Stone?
Give me a break
Listen to Stone in this video and then tell me he's more credible than any other charlatan! Stone's tale is no more plausible than Escamilla's claim that 2-inch high people were found on the moon.
It's not about opening your mind it's about opening your wallet!
Originally posted by Jay-morris
Well, you still have not explained why you put Sereda in this group, that does not make sense. It seems like you gave just put people in you don't like , good or bad
Originally posted by Jay-morris
I know quite alot about sereda, and i just think its wrong to name him as a Charlatan or hoaxer, because he is niether.