It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by zerbot565
Originally posted by rubbertramp
reply to post by russ212
To me, sperm implantation should only be used for a married man and woman that are not able to have a child. This eliminates the question of who is my daddy as the child has grown up with a father.
yet, with the high divorce rate, almost half the kids end up with one parent anyhow.
or possibly visitation with the second parent at most.
divorce rate in america
people divorce withinn 4 years usualy , its becuase thats what it takes to raise a child to an age where they can "take care of them selfs" , so if no child has been made withinn that time your biological clock will make you to produce one way or another , seams that people choose the later , which then stems to social beliefs and rituals in partnership of the today popculture tv nation ,
the above has been proved over and over again by reviews
partner ship is more then a mental connection
its biological harmony according to natures laws
Originally posted by russ212
.... I also believe( you may get angry but that is not my intention) that homosexuality is a mental and phsyical disorder.
So because some of these children grow up having trouble because of the bigots in society the targets of the bigotry should have their rights taken away, that makes no real sense.
And while we're at it, people with red hair shouldn't be able to have children at all. Their kids will get made fun of in school because they're different. Best to save them from that trauma by preventing they from being conceived int he first place.
Originally posted by Maslo
It makes sense to me, because in such a bigoted society, the children could suffer because of their gay parents. This is a legitimate reason to ban gay adoptions, to protect the children not from their gay parents, but from backwards society they live in.
Originally posted by Maslo
It makes sense to me, because in such a bigoted society, the children could suffer because of their gay parents. This is a legitimate reason to ban gay adoptions, to protect the children not from their gay parents, but from backwards society they live in.
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by russ212
russ212,
As long as there are still children dying from starvation, being used as child soldiers or prostitutes I will be the last to comment on two men or two women trying to raise a child....
As long as they love the little one I couldn't care less....
Peace
Known to be estrogenic since the mid 1930s, concerns about the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in consumer products were regularly reported in the news media in 2008 after several governments issued reports questioning its safety, thus prompting some retailers to remove products containing it from their shelves. A 2010 report from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised further concerns regarding exposure of fetuses, infants, and young children.
Originally posted by sensible thought
Exactly how is one a bigot if they don't except homosexuallity as ok.
Treaty everyone with their God given right for respect, but you don't have to give any lifestyle a thumbs up.
.
Originally posted by Romans 10:9
Agreed. Anyone thinking that a kid is not gonna be tripping on 2 mommies or daddies is a fool.
Kids are ruthless towards each other. Think about what the other little bullies will say and do to the kid raised by 2 of the same sex.
Geez, i can't even believe we are at this point where i'm even talking about this shiznit.
This world is going down the tubes for real.