Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by Unity_99
Prove it?
Oxygen molecules don't have brains.
Neither does light, dear one. And yet we're the Infinite Family of Light. I suggest you do a little soul searching, and without any credos and pull
away from the matrix for a while, I have a thread on sungazing safely. Start out like a newborn without credo and ask questions while sungazing,
early morning, late at night, setting sun. Meditate and do whatever it takes to wake up.
Everything in this solar system is output from the sun, in a Hologram, lasers erect it from the pixels. in our case, stars are the projectors, input
signals. When you stand on Terra, you're walking on sunshine, and you are sunhine, literally.
And time, is program in your head, which is really in your soul. In fact the whole screen for the cosmos and digital reality interactive simulation
program we're in which is very hitech, a little more than our computer progerams, is actually in your mind as well.
Clouds can communicate. Everything in the Universe can communicate as well. The only question is, what is a software program in this holographic
digital reality, and communicates as a program to another program, or what is soul/life/inifinite light. We don't know that one much now do we. For
often the Family and Guides and even Ets are in nature, guiding and showing us, nudging and keeping us from destroying ourselves before we can grow in
love.
As for proof, you assume that if soemthing can't be proved its not real. Instead, prove that they don't communicate, that programs can't.
Life simply doesnt work that way. What you assume is that science asks a question. Then lists a couple answers and runs with a no as a definitive.
Sceince does no such thing.
All science does is ask a question, nothing more and nothing less. When anwhere between 2-100 theories, including ones you probably are too primitive
to think of, then its only an opinion to choose one. And when you choose one, please don't think you're being reasonable by trying to limit us to
that one opinion you chose and claim its science to do so, because its not.
[edit on 16-8-2010 by Unity_99]