reply to post by bwinwright
many on ATS are too busy argueing amongst themselves as to the legitimacy of the dots, and too distracted by their personal desires, personal fears,
and personal habits to really spend a lot of time connecting the dots.
"this dot is not a dot."
"that dot is not a dot."
"dot? what dot? you dot lover!"
there are dots. some don't want to believe in dots. they will argue adamantly, while armed only with their opinion about a dot's existance one way
or another.
you have your dots, i have my dots. the mainstream media focusses on diversionary tactics and "gray ops" to keep the general public away from the
dots.
the dots do not serve everyone's agenda if the everyone's agenda is not dot related.
if you were to learn of the dots, then what would be left for the anti-dot community to anti-dot about?
dots.
i'm guessing you either are looking for dots, have too many dots, or are just dotting about yourself about dots.
but i base this guess on what i know about the dots, and what i know about your dots.
is anyone telling us the truth about these dots?
everyone is telling us the truth about these dots, but few are connecting the dots, as it seems it is not their concern to do so.
i say the dots are real. either this or my senses are not to be trusted.
do we share the same senses? yes, but maybe from different perspectives.
look at steven hawkings and his dot quest.
how far from his dot must he be when his distance from his destination is no longer measured in numbers, or even letters? maybe he is chasing a dot
that doesn't exist?
we, you, i, all posters in this forum and on ATS have recently donated via taxes and other tools of ..."dot lovers"... mucho money towards a dot
machine.
$10+ BILLION us dollars have been spent on the hadron collider at the CERN institute in order to prove that a dot that has no mass, and no structure
actually exists.
why are we spending billions on proving nothing exists? Obviously because we don't trust our own senses. isn't there enough "nothing" all around
earth in space?
it doesn't matter whether one calls themselves a believer of dots.
it doesn't matter whether one calls themselves a skeptic of dots.
it doesn't matter whether one calls themselves a debunker of dots.
it doesn't matter, because everyone on the planet is participating actively or passively in the "discovery" of a dot that does not even exist.
dot that does not exist = $10+ billion & millions of man/women hours spent on such a dot.
and still we search for truth concerning these ellusive dots.
truisms are coming from all directions, but pay attention to where the truism announcer is announcing their truisms from. this is my advice.
no one is lying to you about these dots.
maybe they are lying to themselves about these dots, and it makes them feel less alone when others believe their truisms about these dots.
personally, i believe the astronauts testifying under oath to the united nations may not be lying about their encounters with these dots in space.
we are all an individual piece to a rather dotty puzzle. we can help eachother define the shape of the puzzle piece we are, but we cannot pick up
that puzzle piece and put it into place for the puzzle, it seems.
dots, love them or hate them, but we are already participants and/or tools of the trading of dots and how we choose to conform to them or have them
conform to us or connect them is up to us in some measure.
dots.
ats is fun,
et
p.s.
Is anyone telling the truth about aliens and UFO's?
seems to me many people are not in the habit of taking their own advice.
if they choose to not adhere to their own advice, what logical reasoning to i have to believe they are willing to take my advice? care for a dot?
. < this may or may not be a dot
[edit on 1-8-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]