WikiLeaks Twitter Account -- It starts on Monday!

twitter.com...

Real change begins Monday in the WashPost. By the years end, a reformation. Lights on. Rats out.

Is it possible Wikileaks turned over their stuff to the Washington Post? It would make sense to me. What do you think?

[edit on 18-7-2010 by ExPostFacto]

Oh boy "By the years end, a reformation." this better be big! It has to be if he is serious with this comment.

[edit on 18-7-2010 by CREAM]

Wow, what a stategic counter move that makes!
By years end, I hope they mean before the November election for maximum impact!

reply to post by ExPostFacto

The global hegemonists have control of our government, secret government, central bank and military command in the private sector. We need a lot of light to restore checks and balances. We need integrity, accountability and prosecution. We are, for the most part, a land under the rule of law. Let's apply the law to those who have moved above it... while we still have the chance.

I have a feeling this might be the cause of the recent unusual activity with the Global Consciousness Project...

I read that and I didnt get anything

its impossible to guess that they meant

reply to post by CHA0S


Wouldn't that be something? It certainly would explain all the spiking. If this is related to the GCP spikes recently then this is on par with 9/11 as far as consciousness shifts.

Originally posted by Faiol
I read that and I didnt get anything

its impossible to guess that they meant

Suscribe to the Washington Post on Monday morning!

reply to post by gotredeemed


All of those who have moved above the law I see as treasonous.
I expect proper treatment of said treasonous acts as we are in a time of war.

And if this is true, good for us.
Evil must be dragged into the light.

I really enjoyed this tweet. I see the lights coming on and the rats being outed as a very good event ! If something free does not happen, I fear a complete Web clampdown, election hijinks, and economic gamesmanship will cause despair for the ordinary people.
Hit the switch, let 'em run! I have a flyswatter...

reply to post by Granite


is that a joke?

--

back to the real thread

lets assume they are giving WashPost content ... I wouldnt trust content to any kind of organization that I dont have control ... so ... its wierd

I dont know a lot ,I am just trying to understand, since 1 of u guys made me reply anyway

Could it be related to this thread;

www.abovetopsecret.com...

based on this article?

thecable.foreignpolicy.com...

The State Department is bracing for a potentially explosive new feature on the Washington Post website that would publish the names and locations of agencies and firms conducting Top Secret work on behalf of the U.S. government, according to the copy of an email obtained by The Cable.

Seems very likely that's what Wikileaks are talking about, but in this case it appears Wikileaks is not leaking the information, it says in the article it's all based on Open Source Intelligence.

reply to post by CestLaVie


You are probably going to need something a lot bigger than a fly swatter lol. These are rats after all.

I agree. Hit the lights. Let's see who the wizard of oz may be.

Oh god Twitter.... isn't that some form of incontinence?



[edit on 19-7-2010 by Foppezao]

reply to post by harpsounds


Could very well be. The question I want to know is why Wikileaks is stating that by years end the rats will be out. That is a bold statement and to me hints that Wikileaks might be disseminating leaks to news agencies to break the stories. This would prevent wikileaks from exposing sources, being only the informant of the informant.

reply to post by ExPostFacto


He may be just making the general point that some in the MSM are starting to regain their cajones.

Assange has expressed his intent to auction off first publishing rights to the MSM. If they don't publish after a set time, it will go out as normal. I think so far no USA news outlet has taken advantage of this scheme.

Here are a few articles about the auction idea, including one that was described as a failure:

www.wired.com...
arstechnica.com...
www.sgi.nu...

I believe it was the Oslo Freedom Conference where he confirmed the auction model had not worked as he hoped, but I'm not 100% on that.


[edit on 19/7/2010 by harpsounds]

Nothing really they have released, IMO, has been all that breathtaking. I mean they have uncovered some atrocities.. 9/11 texts (weak)..what else..

I mean I already knew our soldiers enjoyed killing people, unfortunately. So hopefully this is a bit more revealing.

Sorry but Wikileaks is not going to give their stuff to a Mainstream Newspaper much less any mainstream outlet. I have worked with Wikileaks on several stories over the past few years. That would be the last thing they do.

And as most people said so far, that statement could mean anything...anything but that.

Thanks OP! Now i can't wait for monday

Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by harpsounds

 

Could very well be. The question I want to know is why Wikileaks is stating that by years end the rats will be out. That is a bold statement and to me hints that Wikileaks might be disseminating leaks to news agencies to break the stories. This would prevent wikileaks from exposing sources, being only the informant of the informant.

Wikileaks has never exposed any of their sources. Most of the time they don't know who gave them the material they get.