It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"And say to the faithful women to lower their gazes, and to guard their private parts, and not to display their beauty except what is apparent of it, and to extend their headcoverings (khimars) to cover their bosoms (jaybs), and not to display their beauty except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband's fathers, or their sons, or their husband's sons, or their brothers, or their brothers' sons, or their sisters' sons, or their womenfolk, or what their right hands rule (slaves), or the followers from the men who do not feel sexual desire, or the small children to whom the nakedness of women is not apparent, and not to strike their feet (on the ground) so as to make known what they hide of their adornments. And turn in repentance to Allah together, O you the faithful, in order that you are successful"
Originally posted by kevinunknown
I don’t think the real problem in Brittan is how multi cultured we are becoming rather it is the groups who seek to halt and reverse our culture my marginalising ethnic and social groups who they consider to be “un-British”. I am of course thinking about the BNP and EDL, banning religious dress is only a victory for them.
Originally posted by ZuluChaka
reply to post by mr-lizard
I dont see it as about religion, but about the right to wear what you want. What right does the government have to force you to show your face? What if you are horribly disfigured and want to cover up? What is the difference between wearing a hat and a big pair of sunglasses or wearing a wig and a wig and a pair of glasses?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Interesting twist:
Do you guys think Burka-wearers would be offended if our youth started wearing them as a fashion-statement or for clubs/discos? And should wearing them for that purpose be banned?
Questions over Questions...
Originally posted by ZuluChaka
reply to post by mr-lizard
Well maybe not in the nanny state of England, but here in the US you could. You should be free to run around in a full helmet if you want.
That probably explains the high amount of school shootings and gun related murders in the USA, simply because nobody got a good look at the assailant?
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
Yeah, because everybody who wears a burka is abused and lives a life of neglect right??
Again, people make statements about things they do not understand, out of fear.
~Keeper
Originally posted by shai hulud
reply to post by tothetenthpower
What does it have to do with it? The demographic of people that wear those ninja suits are decidedly non anglo in make up. If you ban them it wiil be a victory for the non muslim people who only founded the country that these parasite feed upon.
It is a deterioration of British culture which it seems the people over there dont give a damn about. The only group that could make a difference is the BNP, but that would be just too mean. I mean Britain for British? Thats absurd.
Your logic states that islam should do whatever they want as long as the British government lets them do it. Its no fault of islam if they alter and destroy the whole culture.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by mr-lizard
How can you say it’s not a matter of religion, of course it is, your quote makes it clear that some covering is required and the Burka is the one of the traditional Muslim dresses that is used to achieve this. Don’t try to manipulate to appear to be something else just so you can further your own agenda. Notwithstanding the religious implications of a ban it is a direct breach of civil liberties and a indirect attack on all religious groups.
The BNP and EDL are both racist movements who would support this move and actively campaign in its favour and thus they would call it a victory for their movements.