It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by kevinunknown
That's because you are already living in a police state.
The UK under martial law really wouldn't change much at all.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
Well i don’t really mean marital law as such rather military involvement in civilian matter’s. It’s more of a question for Americans but I was wondering if you can envisage any event that would require the intervention of the military. I am sort of thinking along the lines of terrorists taking hostages or a group taking over a oil rig and the use of Delta Force and Seal Team 6. We have done this before in the UK and i know that other states do it however in America it is very controversial so i was just wondering if any ATSters can see any justification for it. Also anyone who isn’t American what do you think about it.
I personally agree with it but only when it is absolutely necessary and as a last resort but sometimes i think it is inevitable. I know some of you may fear it could bring about permanent martial law and coup or whatever else. The truth is i don’t hold such fears when it comes to the UK military becoming involved with civilian terrorist matters.
EDIT:Sorry the OP might not have been clear enough, i am not talking about blanket martial law i am asking what people think of the military being used in civilian matters such as terrorism.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by kevinunknown]
Originally posted by indigothefish
is jail so bad? free food and amenities right?
i don't mean that sarcasticly or comparitively
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by mnemeth1
Interesting but surly there has to come a point where one’s own safety is more important than civil liberties, at least for a short time until any danger has passed or been naturalised
reply to post by kevinunknown
Is Martial Law Really Such A Bad Thing?
Originally posted by Point of No Return
reply to post by kevinunknown
Who would ask themselves if "Martial Law is really such a bad thing"?
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by kevinunknown
Well you ask the question
"Is martial law a bad thing?"
Most Americans would say yes, because we value our rights more than security.
When a society is armed, military security becomes unnecessary.
The left in America would favor martial law because they have been taught that being responsible for your own security is a no-no. Which is why they are in favor of gun laws, but most American's don't fall into that category.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by mnemeth1]
2008
from the Tubeposter :The plans to implement martial law in America have been taking shape for decades, hidden behind "Continuity of Government" contingency planning. Now, with public outcry over the banker bailout bill at fever pitch, all of the pieces are in place for the U.S. Army to start policing American citizens.