It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to whom? What evidence is there that PROJECT SERPO is a "hoax?"
Originally posted by Getsmart
FYI yesterday I told two of my friends abut the MIB who attacked me... They both said it was just a madman who had gotten ticked off when I looked at him, prompting him to action.
Of course they don't believe in MIB, in UFOs, in Aliens or in anything which isn't continuously reported in newspapers or endorsed by institutions.
So I don't mind that they say he couldn't have been targeting me given he didn't get onto the train at the same station as me.
It could easily have served to have me removed from my professional responsibilities - and might have even been staged for that purpose?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by someotherguy
According to whom? What evidence is there that PROJECT SERPO is a "hoax?"
According to Reality Uncovered.
Originally posted by someotherguy
And that "madman" just very conveniently happened to have some burning (anthrax?) powder to dump on your head. OK... LOL
Originally posted by someotherguy
Have people never heard of Project Mockingbird?
Originally posted by someotherguy
Right. Because there's no way the guy could have possibly known where you live or work, or what your travel schedule was, or which stops you usually get on or off of. Have these people ever heard of *spies*?
Originally posted by someotherguy
Or worse. They might have just been trying to get rid of a little trouble-maker all together. I'm really less concerned about your *job* than about your *life.*
Originally posted by Getsmart
It is invariably more unsettling when your close friends take stands to discredit your experience or analysis thereof.
This did not happen in the USA and elsewhere the population is kept under a thicker veil of obstruction and lies than the States.
and you find certain die-hard members from other countries who aren't even at square one when it comes to exploring conspiracy theories. They are so certain of the validity of their brainwashing which they have no doubts about and unconditionally deem to be true and factual, that they are very active in systematically opposing any alternative thoughts going so far as to appear to be agency disinfo operatives, when they are probably just simply totally clueless!
This is what makes me wonder to what extent they are not part of some network? It doesn't seem likely that both would agree so closely otherwise.
One is very smart, at genius level in most people's estimation and at the top of professional classification in his field.
Yet it seemed riskier to depend upon the local authorities who might be complicit rather than fend for myself on my own.
Many others might succumb to entirely different illnesses, such as some rare infection contracted in a military hospital while under observation for testing of toxicological substances?
Originally posted by Getsmart
You are right to be very demanding of those in your entourage, however there are some things we can accept from those we know isofar as they are culturally very different than us. One of my friends does not have the internet nor even a cell phone, so that does much for staying uninformed - and it illustrated how one with a very fine mind can be dumbed down despite his great intelligence by the totally owned and controlled corporate media. Then there is the language barrier. Those who speak English - and he does not - have access to a tremendous amount of broader information than those who don't. So it is up to us to cut them a break? Is it entirely their fault if they're clueless when next to no info is readily available in their language?
So, these people claim to know more than you do, even though they've done no research on X subject? I am very happy to educate people, but I will not tolerate it when they try to discredit me or insult me, especially when I know I know more about the subject. I just think it's funny how people think they know so much about things they've never researched. It really peeves me off sometimes how smug they can be.
Also, I do think professors are installed in key positions as gatekeepers. They are there to keep everyone in line > no outside of the box thinking, please. I had a very arrogant environmental law professor dismiss me once as a "conspiracy theorist" when I asked him about chemtrails & HAARP. Well, I'm sorry, but I think he's just ignorant & uninformed if he doesn't know about those things. AND I do think they raise legitimate environmental concerns.
"Number One, his father was a Defence Contractor to the CIA, in their Mars Liaison Project, and in Project Pegassus - their secret Tesla-based time travel and teleportation program. And he actually met, in the company of his father, three Martian astronauts at a base in New Jersey in 1971, when they were on a liaison visit from Mars to their counterparts in the Defence establishment in the US."
"And our conclusion is that they are humans, like us, the men look slightly different according to him, and according to other observers. They're a bit chunkier, they tend to be bald, because it is a civilization that, for the last 11,500 years, has lived in underground cities."
..."Number Two, starting in 1980 to '83, Andrew Bashagio was enrolled in a special Mars training course, training him to teleport to Mars using a CIA Tesla-based teleportation system. And we have now the testimony of another whistleblower, William B. Stillings, who has come forward and who was also a participant in that program from 1980 to '83, who participated... They went to a training program at the College of the Siskiyous in California near Mount Shasta, and then began teleporting to Mars through 1983. And both of their stories are congruent and consistent."
Originally posted by DJW001
According to Reality Uncovered.
So you blindly trust Reality uncovered?