It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Income redistribution is unconstitutional, yet that fact seems to conveniently fly right over your head.
Wealth creates jobs, not government. Taking away that wealth harms the economy in ways that are too difficult for you to understand.
You sound like you have a serious case of wallet envy, and want to penalize anyone and everyone who has more than you.
Originally posted by jessieg
I live in a small town, only a few thousand people. Murder in this area is almost unheard of. The most we see are speeding tickets, and some drugs and stuff.
Well today we had someone hijack a car and murder a woman and then rob the bank and use her car as a get away car.
This is probably nothing to some of you, but it has us really rattled.
I think we are going to see more and more violence.
Originally posted by Subjective Truth
Like I have said 100 times now if the extension does not pass watch out. Many people will be loosing everything we are talking about millions of people. What do you think is going to happen?
The economy will spin out of control and the people might follow. It is alot like when they said in France to let them eat cake. People will not forget this one and if the Republicans think they are doing this country a favor they could not be more wrong.
It amazes me that they dont see the implications of this. This could turn into the SFTF scenario really fast. This hits people at home and at the dinner table. It is huge but many refuse to see it for what it is.
[edit on 1-7-2010 by Subjective Truth]
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
reply to post by David9176
I still have yet to see anyone explain to me why this burden should fall on the shoulders of the average working man who has a job, David. You know where I stand on this issue. Regardless of how hard some current administration and congressional members try to force it to be so, the USA is still not a communist nation. It is damn near criminal to force austerity on those still working just to cover the extension of pay-for-nothing unemployment coverage.
As for your little soliloquy against the Republicans, I'll ask you to use the 3 lbs of matter between your ears and think before you jump onto the liberal media's bandwagon on this story. The GOP did not stomp their foot down and refuse to help the unemployed any more than the Democrats did. The GOP insisted that the Dems find the funding for yet another jobless benefits (there should be no benefit to being jobless) extension from an existing source rather than just tacking it on to an already crippling debt burden. In turn, the Dems acted like little teenagers with daddy's credit card in one hand and their allowance in the other. "Who the hell is daddy to expect me to use my allowance to buy myself shiny new crap when I can use it for something else and hammer up the debt on his credit card right now?" I blame the Dems... all they had to do here was show a bit of fiscal responsibillity and use some of the currently being pissed away for a handfull of magic beans Obama stimulus money to fund the unemployed. I guess it truly demonstrates just how concerned for America they are when they refuse to give up their little (essentially wastefull and worthless) pet project funds to help the downtrodden American worker.
At least the GOP is holding to some values and priciples here... shame that the same cannot be said of the other side and even bigger shame that there are actually Americans who don't see this for what it is. Come October, changes will transpire to put an end to this foolishness for at least the next 2 years. It will be interesting to see how many of these pet projects funded by money which could be extending jobless benefits right now will get fast tracked over the coming couple of months to ensure the money doesn't go back into the playing field as soon as the rep pushing the project is voted out on their butt.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by David9176
You know , if my business was making millions and millions a year, and the state started taxing me so much it was making it hard to operate, I believe I would take my business elsewhere too, thats called being a smart business man.
As far as your statement about wealth not creating jobs, thats not accurate...
You can have all the ideas in the world, but if you dont have any money or collateral to implement it with, you cant start a business
it doesnt matter if the wealthy can "live" with being taxed 70 percent, thats not right and its THEFT.....the government does it anyway
case in point, if you worked for me and made 50k a year and everyone else made 20k and I told you, that i was going to take 20k of your salary a year and use it to give to those who didnt make as much as you , for their expenses.......would you stay working for me? Would you have ANY ambition to make more? Seeing as how im going to TAKE it!?
Answer......hell no.........youd go somewhere else.......
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by David9176
You know , if my business was making millions and millions a year, and the state started taxing me so much it was making it hard to operate, I believe I would take my business elsewhere too, thats called being a smart business man.
.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
At least the GOP is holding to some values and priciples here... shame that the same cannot be said of the other side and even bigger shame that there are actually Americans who don't see this for what it is.
Originally posted by brainwrek
I could go on and on, but we need to get back to a nation of Constitutional law, a non-fiat currency, and a free market not bound by senseless regulation and governmental interference.
[edit on 1-7-2010 by brainwrek]
Originally posted by brainwrek
reply to post by kozmo
So what, we should be held hostage by what people might do if we dont give them money?
Not a good idea.