It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DCDAVECLARKE
edit: from 2007, not relevant
[edit on 2010.6.27 by Long Lance]
Originally posted by Flatwoods
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
And who even brought up Somalian drug lords?? What of the Zapatistas? What of the indigenous movement in Latin America? What of the Spanish Revolution? What of the rights movements of the early 20th century (which was heavily influenced by Anarchists)? What of the MYRIAD of resistance movements around the world who are GETTING THINGS DONE and resisting tyrannical entities actively and sticking their necks out for what they believe in?? These "kids" actually CARE about what's going on in the world and THAT ALONE deserves a pat on the back. Would you rather they "peacefully" soup up their car, get stoned every day, and make the rounds at strip-malls and fast food joints till they turn 30?? Christ, man... can you EVER be approving of the young? Speaking of the American Revolution, it was VIOLENT and much of it was started by TEENAGERS and men in their 20's!!! So, what's the problem here?
Here's a great example of the point I'm trying to make. I DON'T WANT A VIOLENT REVOLUTION TO TAKE PLACE!! Most folks don't want that kind of thing either. Put put it bluntly, such a revolution would be a very, very bad thing. You think things are bad now? Compare living condition in the US and Canada to those in almost any third world country. We have it better than anyone. The very capitalism these punks are screaming against is what most developing nations are trying desperately to establish, in order to raise their standard of living. I'm sorry, but for me, this childish longing for anarchy has always seemed like a symptom of an over-indulgent, elitist counter-culture.
[edit on 27-6-2010 by Flatwoods]
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
Sounds like you gave up your thinking/questioning mind awhile back. I don't even know why you're here debating if you actually SUPPORT Capitalism of all things...
Anarchists are over-indulgent and elitist?? Once again a TOTAL OXYMORON. Capitalism is ALL ABOUT over-indulgence and elitism. The fact is, regardless of the pushes of third world countries (or rather the rich/governments of them) to adopt first-world Capitalism and consumption rates, the world cant even handle the United States alone!! We CANNOT continue Capitalism as we are. It is not an option, plain and simple. It is responsible for countless injustices as a system and these CANNOT be let to stand simply so we can have air-conditioners, Starbucks, personal Hummers, and plasma screen TVs. I'd gladly and immediately give ALL of that up if it meant the environment would be safe-guarded...
Originally posted by Flatwoods
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
Sounds like you gave up your thinking/questioning mind awhile back. I don't even know why you're here debating if you actually SUPPORT Capitalism of all things...
Anarchists are over-indulgent and elitist?? Once again a TOTAL OXYMORON. Capitalism is ALL ABOUT over-indulgence and elitism. The fact is, regardless of the pushes of third world countries (or rather the rich/governments of them) to adopt first-world Capitalism and consumption rates, the world cant even handle the United States alone!! We CANNOT continue Capitalism as we are. It is not an option, plain and simple. It is responsible for countless injustices as a system and these CANNOT be let to stand simply so we can have air-conditioners, Starbucks, personal Hummers, and plasma screen TVs. I'd gladly and immediately give ALL of that up if it meant the environment would be safe-guarded...
My thinking/questioning mind is in full effect. What I question is the logic of anarchism. As for socialism, it's a complete joke. All it does is ensure poverty for everyone.
I live in California, where an average summer day tops 100 degrees Fahrenheit(that's 38 degrees Celsius for all you metrics). Not all of us get the luxury of living in a cool climate. So yes, I love my air conditioning, and would be miserable without it. I don't make near enough money to buy a Hummer, but if someone does, more power to them - it's their money. As for the plasma screen TV, I hope to own one soon. Starbucks I could care less about. They stopped caring about coffee a long time ago.
My political concerns of late center more on local politics than anything global. Our state has been hit hardest by the recession, and now we are having to ditch social benefit programs right and left. But that's not surprising when one considers the extent to which business has been driven out of our state by environmental extremists and high taxes. What we need now are jobs, jobs, and more jobs, and the way to do that is by making California the most business friendly state in the country. That is why I support dumping a lot of the useless environmental restrictions put on industry, especially those that are concerned with limiting greenhouse emissions. Lately I'm becoming more and more convinced that the climate change issue is a hoax.
So yes, I am a huge fan of capitalism. I love my pickup truck, my air conditioning, my television, my Xbox, and my internet. I fully realize that this stands in stark contrast to the world envisioned by the environmental activists - a world with no cars, no plastic, no industry, and no jobs. It's a world in which we sit sweating inside our 100 degree apartments waiting for a welfare check that may or may not come from a bankrupt socialist state. I don't want to live in that kind of world.
Capitalism has created the finest standard of living anywhere in the world, and is the only true system by which people can become upwardly mobile and rise above their economic class. If the world leaders attending the G20 summit are there to further the interests of increased trade and open markets between nations, I support them too.
[edit on 27-6-2010 by Flatwoods]
GLOBAL BANK TAX TO PAY FOR BAILOUTS: ABANDONED
Any determination to introduce a common tax on banks to shield taxpayers from paying for another bailout -- an approach favored by Germany and its EU partners -- formally fell by the wayside on Sunday. G20 leaders agreed there are a range of policy approaches for making banks pay a "fair and substantial" contribution toward any government interventions.
"Some countries are pursuing a financial levy. Other countries are pursuing different approaches," the summit's communique said tersely.
It marks a victory for host Canada, along with Japan, Brazil and Australia, who balked at piling a tax on their banks, which required no bailouts during the financial crisis.
Any tax now introduced in Germany, France and Britain will have to be modest or else risk banks shifting operations to more tax-friendly locations.
Originally posted by NoHierarchy
So you don't think the delegates at G20 aren't at least a littttle bit scared of these protests?? I mean they're calling for possible EVACUATION of them... how is that not fear based? I don't even think any of these protesters would actually try to HURT them... I just think even holding the meetings hostage (not the people) and DEMANDING to be heard and DEMANDING serious answers is what they fear. Though I'm sure they understand the protests even less than the media does, thus the ignorant fear and continuance of their blind injustices.
As for Starbucks... I can't say how much "they" care, but it absolutely has SOME effect on their awareness of these protests and the rage/concerns against them (and businesses like them). Though I have the same concern that a broken window will cause more problems for the local workers than the CEO, I still believe in the larger struggle it is acceptable. Local workers SHOULD be more aware of the organizations they work for and the ethics involved (no matter how far removed). Who knows, maybe some of the workers secretly cheered it on! We cannot say for sure... but like I said in a previous reply- simply holding up a sign in a sea of signs will NOT make Starbucks think about ANYTHING they're doing. Vandalism is historically a very clear (even if brash) demonstration of disapproval of a powerful entity and I accept its role in civil disobedience so long as the targets are legit.
Like I said, it's about SENDING A STRONG MESSAGE without hurting anybody. Even the local workers don't lose any money when this happens... I'm sure they could care less in that respect, unless they actually care about the profits of the CEO, in which case I have no patience for their ignorance of the reality of the organizations/systems they do the slave-work for.
“I was awoken to four police officers in my bedroom ... the officer in charge ... was pointing a handgun at me and asked me my name and who else was in the house,” he wrote. “They repeatedly said they had a search warrant and arrest warrant for me. At no point did they produce this warrant to prove my name was on it and I suspect they were lying. “