It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by RogerT
None of your blustering answers the questions, RogerT. If this were an inexpensive, effective treatment, why aren't we seeing incredible cancer/infection survival rates in nations outside the reach of Pharma?
Why wouldn't Japan be picking this up? They have strict regulations on funding/influence of pharmaceutical companies, so it doesn't seem likely this machine would be blocked. What about Russia? As a former citizen of the USSR and Russian Federation, and as someone who has practiced medicine there, I can absolutely assure you that the pharmaceutical companies and the government of Russia has little to no influence over what treatments are allowed. Why hasn't Russia picked up Beck's technology?
with an easy to grow plant that when brewed as a tea it cured all ills and then I made it available to all to grow their own plants, but after 30 years the idea was mostly buried and still limited? This would mean that just maybe the plant didn’t live up to all the claims I made about it….
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by RogerT
So, in other words, you have no explanation beyond, "people must be doing what their doctors tell them"? Have you ever even been to a developing or industrializing nation? Try coming to Russia. Very, very few people ever go to the doctor, and even fewer follow doctor's orders, when compared to the United States. That's why viral and bacterial diseases that are all but eradicated in the USA are still rampant in Russia, such as giardia and cholera. Given this information, why hasn't something as "inexpensive and effective" as Beck's technology taken off there?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by RogerT
So, in other words, you have no explanation beyond, "people must be doing what their doctors tell them"? Have you ever even been to a developing or industrializing nation?
Probably because most people trust their doctors and follow their advice when it comes to healing, especially in lesser developed nations, and most doctors exhibit your attitude towards anything that hasn't jumped all the elitist club hurdles.
I lived in Bangladesh for 2 years, Thailand for a year, East Africa for 6 months and have spent extended time in about 30 other countries. Without exception, the less educated the people, the more they revere doctors, especially western doctors.
Originally posted by RogerT
By the way, I lived in Bangladesh for 2 years, Thailand for a year, East Africa for 6 months and have spent extended time in about 30 other countries. Without exception, the less educated the people, the more they revere doctors, especially western doctors.
Now, I'm willing to bet that many Beck units are being used in Russia and plenty of people are getting spectacular results, but here's the thing:
1. How would you know about it anyway?
2. Even if you heard about it, you'd just dismiss it as worthless anecdotal evidence, just like you have dismissed the many valuable peer reviews given to you freely and openly here on this very thread.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by RogerT
Please stop dodging my questions and points. I never mentioned anything about the quality of Russian physicians, nor did I mention anything about the quality of "bone cancer" therapies. You have yet to answer my (and another poster's) simple question: why has something that is supposedly so inexpensive and successful not been taken up in other countries?
Originally posted by RogerT
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by RogerT
Please stop dodging my questions and points. I never mentioned anything about the quality of Russian physicians, nor did I mention anything about the quality of "bone cancer" therapies. You have yet to answer my (and another poster's) simple question: why has something that is supposedly so inexpensive and successful not been taken up in other countries?
I am tired and bored of answering this question for you, as I'm sure are many other ATS members that you manage to exsasperate with your unwillingness to actually listen!
Why are you so sure that this technology has NOT been taken up in other countries. If you search the net, you can clearly see that it has.
I don't read russian, so I can't search .ru sites, but maybe you could quit being obstinate and take a look for us.
Now if you are still banging on about peer reviewed clinical trials, well I and many others are sick and tired of explaining that one to you, although the exercise has probably helped to elucidate the reality of matters to many others who view the thread.
Originally posted by Tifozi
reply to post by RogerT
Probably because most people trust their doctors and follow their advice when it comes to healing, especially in lesser developed nations, and most doctors exhibit your attitude towards anything that hasn't jumped all the elitist club hurdles.
Whoever told you that in poor countries people trust in doctors never left his comfortable, rich, country. That's such a ignorant statement.
#EDIT#
I lived in Bangladesh for 2 years, Thailand for a year, East Africa for 6 months and have spent extended time in about 30 other countries. Without exception, the less educated the people, the more they revere doctors, especially western doctors.
So it's just a made up problem when people refuse to seek medical help given for free, and still trust more on their "old medicines"?
Stop making sh*t up to justify what you believe in.
[edit on 21/6/10 by Tifozi]
Originally posted by crichton13
I had a dig around and found and skipped thru the original US Patent application.
Although Kalli does mention a smaller, portable device, it's clear from his drawings etc. that a more efficacious method is to draw the blood thru the device somewhat like a dialysis filter. The charge is then pumped thru the blood in a resevoir and then back into the body.
Indeed, he even went as far as to design a smaller version that would be inserted into the body and attached via a main artery which would simply sit there cleaning the blood pretty much, forever I guess.
But sadly, the trail goes cold on practical applications...