How the Oil Spill is Killing the Tea Party

Originally posted by ErEhWoN
You its funny, everyone keeps mentioning this 'Tea Party', but these tea baggers, all they want is for you to vote republican?

We already tried them, didnt work to good,

1. I hate republicans.

2. Obama is worse than Bush on matters of finance.

-He has appointed a Goldman crony to run the Treasury
-He has appointed Bernanke to a second term
-He has stood behind a 23.7 trillion dollar looting of the tax payer by bankers
-He has promoted the "too big to fail" baloney, along with all the other statists.
-He has expanded the wars
etc.. etc.. etc..


Believing that Obama is actually working in your best interest given his appointments and actions is about as realistic as believing in fairy dust.

All of you are hypocrites.

You act as if Obama has no power to stop anything Bush did.

Blaming this on Bush is outrageous considering that Obama has a democratic congress that could have reversed anything Bush has done.

They have not.

You know why they haven't?

Because just like professional wrestling, at the end of the day, they all love each other.

I find it even more outrageous that people would dare to come into this forum and claim handing 23.7 trillion to bankers is necessary and good.

That is so outrageous that I have to assume the people saying it are PAID ACTORS - NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SAY THAT UNLESS THEY WERE PAID TO SAY THAT.

This forum is full of paid propagandists working for government.



[edit on 17-6-2010 by mnemeth1]

Originally posted by mnemeth1
Because just like professional wrestling, at the end of the day, they all love each other.

We aree on that.

I find it even more outrageous that people would dare to come into this forum and claim handing 23.7 trillion to bankers is necessary and good.

That is so outrageous that I have to assume the people saying it are PAID ACTORS - NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SAY THAT UNLESS THEY WERE PAID TO SAY THAT.

This forum is full of paid propagandists working for government.

That was the advice of many of the world's best economists. Infusing huge sums of money into the economy worked in the 1930's. And in fact, there hasn't been a depression as deep as could have been, at least not yet.

We're not out of the woods yet.

Congress and the two presidents weren't spending all that money for the hell of it. It was and is a calculated risk.





[edit on 17-6-2010 by Sestias]

[edit on 17-6-2010 by Sestias]