It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
That's a great idea! Opening a new forum will undoubtedly ease some situations (and by situations I mean fights) between those who want to take a scientific approach to the subject and those who don't.
Originally posted by Radiobuzz
reply to post by MikeboydUS
That's a great idea! Opening a new forum will undoubtedly ease some situations (and by situations I mean fights) between those who want to take a scientific approach to the subject and those who don't. Although, on the other hand, I don't think mods would open a whole new forum just because. We're grown ups and we should be able to coexist in the same space.
Originally posted by cripmeister
We already have sections dedicated to New Age type stuff - The Grey Area and the Mysterious Subjects section. Threads just need to move.
"...if you disagree with the idea of supporting highly-speculative ideas as a means to test the upper boundaries of our imagination, then quite frankly, ATS is not for you." -Springer (Site Owner)
OK I digested that food for thought by comparing the words "highly speculative" in Springer's quote to the words "highly speculative" in the skunk works forum:
Originally posted by Malcram
Originally posted by cripmeister
We already have sections dedicated to New Age type stuff - The Grey Area and the Mysterious Subjects section. Threads just need to move.
While I remain ambivalent about these calls to separate the discussion of the UFO phenomena from "New Age" themes that some consider silly or irrelevant (because this attempt is often based on a rather haughty presumption of what the UFO phenomena "is" and "is not", or "cannot be") I came across a quote I thought was interesting and relevant to this issue. It was on AnnunakiX's signature:
Food for thought.
"...if you disagree with the idea of supporting highly-speculative ideas as a means to test the upper boundaries of our imagination, then quite frankly, ATS is not for you." -Springer (Site Owner)
That would seem to support that yes, ATS does encourage highly speculative topics and yes, there is a place for them, which isn't in this forum. The Gray area would be another, as cripmeister mentioned. By the way, I have to love that tinfoil hat but I don't understand the antennae, I thought the whole idea of the tinfoil hat was to NOT receive transmissions? Oh, I get it, maybe he's sending transmissions...
The ATS Skunk Works Forum!
This forum is dedicated to the all-important highly speculative topics that may not be substantiated by many, if any facts and span the spectrum of topics discussed on ATS.
Originally posted by ArbitrageurOK I digested that food for thought by comparing the words "highly speculative" in Springer's quote to the words "highly speculative" in the skunk works forum:
The ATS Skunk Works Forum!
This forum is dedicated to the all-important highly speculative topics that may not be substantiated by many, if any facts and span the spectrum of topics discussed on ATS.
That would seem to support that yes, ATS does encourage highly speculative topics and yes, there is a place for them, which isn't in this forum....
So yes, let's move threads as appropriate to the already designated forums, I'm not sure we need another forum.
"This forum is dedicated to the discussion of historic and contemporary events related to extraterrestrial encounters, UFO sightings, and speculation about related subjects".
UFO Forum READ BEFORE Posting **02/18/2007 UPDATE***
The civil and courteous discussion of ideas, sightings, reports, beliefs, opinions and stories is what this forum is for. Whenever we catch someone attempting to hoax this community we ban them straight away...That is NOT the same as presenting your life experience or opinions/beliefs on the subject as just that, your opinions, beliefs and experiences and I will not tolerate ANYONE getting rude or acting uncivil toward those who would share these things with our community.
If the Members don't want to read the information they won't and the thread will die, we do NOT need some sort of self appointed vigilante group policing threads on ATS...
...this topic is 99% SUBJECTIVE
This is NOT the "I am going to expose a FRAUD" Forum it's the ALIENS and UFO FORUM.
EVERY MEMBER has the privilege afforded them to SHARE THEIR STORY UNMOLESTED BY WORTHLESS DEMANDS FOR PROOF/EVIDENCE. AND CERTAINLY WITHOUT BEING DERIDED FOR NOT HAVING IT. If SOMEONE SAYS THEY HAVE NO PROOF THAT ENDS IT.
The skeptics are asking for a separate forum for crying out loud when all that needs to be done is NOT CLICK the threads you don't want to read.
Originally posted by Malcram
Further, your statement appears to be based on the assumption that you know or can judge what is "highly speculative" and what is not when it comes to the issue of UFO's, which is obviously impossible, because no one knows.
It's all speculative.
The difference is, there are speculations we prefer and others we don't. But that's a personal perspective and a personal preference. Why should the pet speculations of a certain section of the membership be given preferential treatment?
Originally posted by Malcram
That quote I just posted by Springer got me thinking.
Am I the only one who has noticed that an ideological 'coup' has been happening at this forum over the past few years, with the forum deviating significantly from it's original stated purpose as enshrined in the mission statements due to a number of very vocal members attempting to remake it into something more to their liking?
[edit on 13-6-2010 by Malcram]