It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by impressme
The fact is no one has debunked anything in here much less to even know how to debate.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by impressme
The fact is no one has debunked anything in here much less to even know how to debate.
No, the fact is that you are so much in love with your conspiracy stories that you will refuse to accept anything which refutes them, even to the point where you have to employ blatant double standards to keep them alive.
Case in point- you are quite famous for using the "witnesses heard explosions" card to support the idea there were bombs in the WTC, but when we likewise point out that "witnesses saw the passenger jet hit the Pentagon" you continuously run away from the point the same way vampires run away from sunlight. The reason why eyewitnesses reports in one location are "legitimate information" while eyewitness reports in another location, "cannot be believed" is obvious- it depends entirely on whether the evidence happen to agree with what you yourself want to believe. You want to believe there were bombs in the WTC = witnesses are credible, you want to believe a missile hit the Pentagon = witnesses cannot be believed.
The intellectually dishonest bias you have in your belief that the History Channel is a "propaganda tool" is therefore self evident.
Originally posted by iamcpc
when presented with three seperate teams of professors that support some of the OS theories he dismisses them as not credible, liars, or part of the conspiracy.
when presented with three seperate teams of professors that support some of the OS theories he dismisses them as not credible, liars, or part of the conspiracy.
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by iamcpc
when presented with three seperate teams of professors that support some of the OS theories he dismisses them as not credible, liars, or part of the conspiracy.
Wow! And you have dismiss every single piece of credible science that proves the OS is all hogwash. Looks, like the pot-calling kettle again, if you ask me.
Originally posted by impressme
The History channel left out Thermite because they probably were told to. We cannot have the mass populations mad at our government for committing a false flag operation using na-no Thermite can we.
The History channel left out Thermite because they probably were told to. We cannot have the mass populations mad at our government for committing a false flag operation using na-no Thermite can we...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by impressme
Not sure why everyone missed this inconsistency in YOUR claims....I don't think I have to go back and re-hash the 'claims' of explosives, which were made by observation of the debris that was "blasted" laterally, do I? I think everyone remembers WHO made that claim....