It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
What it boils down to, and it doesn't get much simpler than this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a39ae149b0f6.gif[/atsimg]
Buildings can't do that without all of the support columns being severed at the exact same time. Fire can't do that, that's why CD companies don't use fire.
Not a single person can refute this fact, no matter what NIST or anyone else says.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
What it boils down to, and it doesn't get much simpler than this:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a39ae149b0f6.gif[/atsimg]
Buildings can't do that without all of the support columns being severed at the exact same time. Fire can't do that, that's why CD companies don't use fire.
Not a single person can refute this fact, no matter what NIST or anyone else says.
Great thread.
Originally posted by demonseed
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Although i know how you feel in your views its important for people to see the testimony of *experts*. If you show an expert the above .gif, their response would be the single most important response. Not only that, but if they conclude its a controlled demolition, the media and popular mechanics will have no choice but to check it out.
Rather than documenting he said/she saids, we need to actually go out there and interview these people.
If an expert can determine the exact cause of a building collapse by looking at a 3 second video and in the course of that 3 seconds give expert testimony of the causes of the building's collapse then I would not consider that expert as a reliable source. No matter what they said.
Originally posted by Alfie1
reply to post by demonseed
I applaud your stated intention to " interview the experts " but I have to say that, from your op, you appear to be starting off with a strong bias.
So far as what people will think in 100 years, the truth is no-one will care. Have you been concerned lately as to who blew up the Maine in Havana harbour ? Said by some to be the US government seeking an excuse to intervene in Cuba :-
archive.southcoasttoday.com...
Originally posted by PersonalChoice
reply to post by demonseed
You do realize that the whole entire subject is hotter than a firecracker right now. Getting anyone with a real job to lose, to talk is going to be a tough cookie to crack.
MSM sources can barely get anything more than the "ok to say" lines praising the official story (all the while making wise cracks about CT'ers), let alone some no name guy who's gonna put them straight on you tube.
All I'm saying is don't be surprised, you might be better off going for the off the record comments.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
One of the most important things I have learned in this whole process is that the usual forensic methods by which evidence is gathered in criminal cases are set aside when the suspect in the case is the government, which controls all of the investigating and prosecuting agencies.