Alleged NASA -Affiliated Astronomer Deciphers 'Intelligence' Signal From Nearby Stars

reply to post by Springer


hi springer, thanks for your swift and positive action, it is highly appreciated.

i will u2u now, im not certain about the other but im suspicious.

thanks

rich

a message to all the avid readers of this thread, it may seem that ive been a bit of a spoilsport in reporting the nefarious activity of certain members and that may slow the thread down but my reasoning is simple.

the person in question has hurt many people over the years and i feel a certain responsibility in giving a return on the extremely generous help ive been given by my sources.

also the person in question specifically set out with the intention of sewing the seeds of doubt into any visiting readers minds, hopefully my actions will have put a stop to that and given even more proof that this person is a pathological liar and will go to any lengths to try and protect those lies.

a message to judy faltskog, i know you are reading this so i have a couple of things to say, once again you have failed against modern technology and the minds of good people that don't like being conned, i really think that it's time you grew up and put a stop to all this nonsense while you still have enough years to repair some of the damage you have caused to your children and others, do you really want to go to your grave being remembered like this?.

thanks

rich

Originally posted by evinah
reply to post by Netties Hermit

 

LadySambucca, Judy and Sun Flare are all at the same party... ! It's so obvious... just a fine psychological game... It would be a good drama movie...

Like I said already on page 123 that those 3 were at the same party... meaning they were the same person... I'm glad she couldn't play that little game for long....

Wow. a person sleeps and misses 5 pages of drama. A lot to absorb and even though Judy spewed some amusing tales there is always a grain of truth entangled in deceit.

Still rubbing sleep from eyes but did I read somewhere that she claims Herschel is a charlatan or did I dream that?

Oh boy, this is like Christmas. Present after present was served up whilst I slept.

Have an idea how to use it. Thanks Judy 1, Judy 2, and Judy 3.

Netties, you errr, Ladies did a great job last night.

Judy if you manage your way back on here using a different puter, have one unsettled question.

Is Wayne your sister?

thanks
Ra the sun

hi all,
due to some correspondence ive had, it turns out that Nitromaria may be the real deal, although i can't offer any evidence either way because its confidential, i would still ask that we give her the benefit of the doubt and be courteous.

thanks

rich

reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND


Hi Rich.

I too have received information and agree with your assessment. Am currently in contact with her and she appears legit.

We are a group of people that are highly disappointed!

We have been following this topic closely and for the first time it got really interesting and now you are trying to stop Lady S and Sunflare and Nitromaria.

Why not let them be ? Wait till they come back up again and see what they have to say ? There were some interesting facts that sounded quite logical
and realistic even if it is maybe Judy herself. Maybe she is trying to tell us someting. Why not let her put her side of the story.

Maybe Rich is afraid she / they might pull the rug from under his feet ?

Give everybody a fair chance !

The story about Frederika really touched me and changed my view totally and Judy's eyes do look sad !

Let them be there is nothing to be afraid of Rich !

It is very sad, but I feel your forum is totally biased.

Let each person make up their minds what is true or not. We are adult enough to decide what is right and wrong without having a person like "Rich England" deciding for us, what the rest of the world is allowed to read or not.

We dont need any parental controll!

We only want the TRUTH!

Is that to much to ask for????

Originally posted by Springer
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

 

I found two accounts that were the same person... If you look above it's pretty obvious who they were...

U2U me with the other "suspects" and I'll make sure they are dealt with if they are the same person.

Springer...

Hell Ya! Thank you much for this Springer

reply to post by DoubtfullDina


the truth is already there for all to see in factual proveable traceable legal documentation, and also in a smoking gun post on the whickham message board posted by none other than judy faltskog herself....

now please if you can dispute any of those then feel free to attempt it, i am willing to go to court over it because i know those documents have already stood up in a court of law not once but twice.

thanks

rich

reply to post by DoubtfullDina


lol, what took you so long. Anyway you didn't answer my question about wayne.
still waking up, this is a riot.

And Wayne Herschel is an idiot. His latest claims and absurd science

-Wayne Herschel- ‎:
SPHINX SECRETS REVEALED
WHY ITS BACK IS FLAT - DOOR AT BACK OF HEAD

The Sphinx had something very important take place on its back and that is why its flat... it most likely had a door at the back of its head too for some very unusual visitors to enter the Hall of R...ecords too.

1) The back of the head has lime cement repairs that are said to be the oldest evidence of cement predating 2000 yrs old. A repair, or door filled in by Thutmosis perhaps?
2) The back of the head today has line of light radiating from the lost door
3) The back of the head was a target of excavation by Howard Vyse the explorer.
4) The back of the head has had repairs over 80 years ago using cement naturally coloured and blended to match limestone natural side of the head after Howard Vyse inflicted his damages.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh please go to his old FB page and look at his crayon picture of his Flying Saucer on the back of the Sphinx. Hurry before his mommy makes him put it back on the refrigerator with the rest of his drawings.

Believe me, its worth it for the laugh.

And Rich, you know we are all there with you and behind you.

[edit on 23-8-2010 by dcmb1490]

reply to post by DoubtfullDina
Rich did the right thing!

He was rightfully suspicious and went to the mods. The mods made the decision to do what they did because someone broke the T&C of this site.

Originally posted by DoubtfullDina
We only want the TRUTH!

Is that to much to ask for????

Quoted for ironic truth!!

And Rich, as interesting as a psychotic soap opera as it was getting there a sock puppet account that only backs up lies is not something worth having anywhere near these boards - especially in light of the shattered psyche of a gender swapping fraud who cons gullible people out of their money.

For the record I did love the jilted wife tale of how sexy Judy was and how very much a woman she was - completely normal behaviour for someone in that position, yessir completely.

-m0r

reply to post by DoubtfullDina


Judy, do something useful for once. Get Vunderboy Wayne back in here on this thread. Now.

reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND


The Truth Is out There, but it is your truth only! Please dont try and think for us. Let us dicide what is True or Not.

You constantly talk of evidence, but I have not seen any evidence anywhere. It is very easy to fake documents and sell them to the public on a website like this as the truth..... Your truth, not necessarily mine or the that of the rest of the world.

What qualiies anybody here to judge a person. I read that one poster here claims to be an ex police ofiicer. Please let him prove that he is who he says he is. Let the rest of the world see your official credentials.

How can I be sure that you are who you claim to be and that your evidence is not a forgery? Can you please prove to me and the world you are who you are and that you have evidence. If you want to make this thread an open court, then lets at least have a judge that is not biased with preconcieved beliefs!

People you are not here to solve a crime! Most of you have already judged Ms Faltskog as a criminal! What authorty of law does any of you have to make such a judgement!

I ask that you all see what you are doing here and through your harsh words and accusations what you have become.

From page one to the last I have seen that basic human values does not count here at all.

reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND


It's Wayne's "Light Warrior" offensive ramping up, I believe. First, a couple of scouts came in to gauge the lay of the land, and prep for bombardment. The objective, as far as I can discern, is not to sew the seeds of doubt so much as it is to derail the thread, and get it shut down.

That tells me two things:

1) Our assessments have been spot on the target, and damage to the "UV in a Radio 'scope" story, as well as the credibility of the original perpetrators, is occurring. They seek for damage control, and the only way to do that is to shut the thread down, and cut off the flow of information. Seeds of doubt won't work for them, because with all the credible evidence present, those seeds won't be able to take root.

That's my BDA on our efforts here. Target locked on, fire for effect.

2) Wayne is a man of his word, at least in this respect. He threatened a "Light Warrior" assault, and here it is!

I believe ladySambuca was none other than Judy herself, and so, by extension, was SunFlare (interesting astronomically oriented name, that!). I base that opinion on the picture she posted, which I "could not refute". I couldn't "refute" it, because it actually IS a picture of Judy. To be sure, it has been doctored and tinkered with to make a presentation of non-factual "evidence", but in the main, the face WAS hers, and the face hadn't been messed with all that much, so the background and such are is the actual photo as well. Under magnification, it can be seen that the hair "strays" don't appear to have been cropped around, so the background for the head is likely the original picture.

The neck area has been tampered with, as has the chest area. Efforts have been made to conceal seams in the picture from crop-and-paste operations. It was sort of laughable that efforts were made to conceal the adam's apple, because even as James, van Greunen's adams apple wasn't all that prominent, as can be seen in the photo of he and Janice. I only made an issue of it to see what would happen, and it appears that the bait was taken.

Then there's the matter of the missing metadata. I couldn't be sure that wasn't unintentional, but brought it up to see what would happen. What I got was an admission that it had been removed intentionally, to "protect " an identity which any IT person should reasonably know would never have been in jeopardy from that data set.

The picture is far more recent than the 16 years old claim alleged, going by the appearance of Judy's age, as compared to the other photos out there in the "wild" of her. As speculation, removal of the EXIF information may well have been done to conceal that it was taken with a digital camera, recently, rather than produced by scanning an old print. The EXIF data would have given the lie to that, and so was removed. It would NOT have said "this photo was scanned by LadySambuca, whose real name is Clyde Farnsworth, and who lives at 1313 Mockingbird Lane, with an IP address of 000.000.000.001".

The really interesting upshot, and perhaps a tale told, about this is that it's a relatively recent picture of Judy, not yet released into the wilds of the internet before this. LadySambuca would have to get that from SOMEWHERE.

And Judy can produce photos of herself at will.

reply to post by DoubtfullDina
[moreli
like i already said, the documents are proveable and traceable and i am willing to go to a court of law and prove it, care to take me up on that instead of just spouting?.

and please instead of just talking why don't you attempt to dispute them and explain the whickham message board post?.

ill repeat myself for your benefit I AM WILLING TO GO TO A COURT OF LAW OVER THIS.

thanks

rich

reply to post by DoubtfullDina


To lay it out simple and straight for you, we are not the ones making a claim which, if true, could be ranked as the most important discovery in mankind's entire existance.
It is fair to say that W & J deserve more scrutiny than an average Joe claiming they once worked as a cop.

reply to post by DoubtfullDina


En Garde!

Make sure you don't hide your Light under a bushel!

That's very unbecoming in a Light Warrior.

As you began your post: "We are a group"...

Which translates to me as "We are the Borg..."