It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Smoke Cloud from base before WTC collapse. What's causing it?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 01:31 AM
link   
Hello gang.

I know another 9/11 thread...yippie.

Seriously though, I ran across this video and thought it an important question...Where is this huge cloud coming from prior to the tower's collapse.

I'm going to go with base charges, but who knows.

I'm not posting this to fight out ideas or theory, so let's stick to the question if we can...Again, what is causing this huge plume of smoke?



So, anyone?

Peace

[edit on 23-4-2010 by letthereaderunderstand]



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 09:48 PM
link   
It's the smoke plume from the south tower collapse.

In the video you posted, if you look closely at the screen shot he shows with the smoke plume you can clearly see only one tower is standing.

The guy is lying with a straight face rather well though huh?



posted on Apr, 23 2010 @ 10:31 PM
link   
The smoke is from the collapsing south tower. The collapse was hard to see from that point of view because of the north tower blocking the view.










[edit on 24-4-2010 by _BoneZ_]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:01 AM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


Vehicles on fire near pedestrian bridge on West St

www.disclose.tv...

Another view

www.youtube.com...


Slide show of burning vehicles - many post collapse

First couple in the series are marked Liberty St at 850-851AM
puts them pre collapse on South side WTC complex

link




[mod edit: fixed long link skewing page view]

[edit on 24-4-2010 by 12m8keall2c]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:04 AM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 


Link to slide hoew didn't work

Try this - click on slideshow link

doyoueverwonderblog.wordpress.com...



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:11 AM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


There is no way that smoke is from burning cars. To me it looks like dust from the collapsing tower. Unless I'm looking at the wrong part.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by System
There is no way that smoke is from burning cars. To me it looks like dust from the collapsing tower. Unless I'm looking at the wrong part.

You're correct. I didn't watch the video because I assumed it was of the smoke coming from the burning cars below. That means thedman didn't watch it either.


But yes, why Dave vonKleist didn't know the south tower had collapsed is beyond me.

I edited my post above to reflect that.






[edit on 24-4-2010 by _BoneZ_]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


Okay _BoneZ_ , I need your take on this . This is one of those I hadn't seen before now .

At the end of the vid in the OP , click on vid #3 , titled ' 9/11 WTC "Call Me Crazy"-where's the wing .

Stop the vid at 0:17 and again at 0:27.

How is this possible ?



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by _BoneZ_

But yes, why Dave vonKleist didn't know the south tower had collapsed is beyond me.



It's very easy to explain.

There is no such thing as a reliable "truth" reseacher.

They are either:

1- liars
2- ignorant of facts
3- suffering from a level of cognitive dissonance that eliminates reality.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


You asked for pictures of burning vehicles

I provided some.....



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by okbmd
 


Artifacts from poor video recording and compression. Look at old recorded VHS tapes and see how peoples' heads get chopped off or people lose limbs because the tape is so worn from being recorded and erased over and over again.



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   
reply to post by _BoneZ_
 


Maybe you mis-understood me . I wasn't referring to the 'plane with no wings' .

EDIT[actually it is the 'no-wings' plane I am referring to but , not the issue of 'no-wings' , but the following : ]

At 0:17 and 0:27 it can clearly be seen that the nose of the plane has travelled all the way thru the building and out the other side .

How is this possible , for it to be intact and showing no signs of damage ?

I don't recall any reports that spoke of a nose section being recovered .

Also , if you stop and start the vid rapidly at these two points , you can clearly see that a substantial portion of the plane has passed entirely thru the building .

And yet , you see no evidence of it breaking away and projecting itself in the direction of the debris that is being propelled away from the tower .

???

[edit on 24-4-2010 by okbmd]



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 08:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by okbmd
At 0:17 and 0:27 it can clearly be seen that the nose of the plane has travelled all the way thru the building and out the other side .

For more information on the "nose", see my post below:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:00 PM
link   
It's actually the hot air comming from WeedWhacker...oh wait, he's not here yet..hehehe



posted on Apr, 24 2010 @ 09:14 PM
link   
If our government, secret, underground, shadow, or whatever was involved (probable, in my view), it, or they, got away with it. To my mind, the salient point of the terrible events of Sept. 11, 2001, has less to do with loss of life and 'valuable' real estate than with the realization that fundementalism has come a cropper and spread (from whatever viewpoint or source) from the province, to the globe. Hand-feeding a rabid animal, while noble, will always be dicey.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join