Ultimate Defence

What do you think the least vulnerable place is if someone wants to kill you and they have any weaponry that exists today available to them?

I think being submerged in an ocean on a nuclear submarine is the safest...Well until you run out of food that is.

get real.....the moon is a good place too

NORAD under Mount Chyene. It can't be broken by anything made today.

Could you get through with a Tunnel Boring Machine or maybe Bunker Busters? Just an idea.

We don't need to think that complex. Osama bin Ladin might know some good answers on this one.

Basically it is safe everywhere you aren't expected to be and the people around you are trustworthy.

[Edited on 5-6-2004 by shoo]

Tell that to Saddam Hussein

Was he expected to be found in a tiny hole in the ground?

[Edited on 5/6/04 by Hyperen]

The Cheyenne Mountain Complex is NOT impervious to all known weapons or technologies. It is designed to to withstand near hits/misses with nuclear weapons. Now, with the advances in made in missile tageting, people can "Put Warheads On Foreheads". It will not withstand any direct hit (something withing one kiloyard). Now, being on a submarine during a nuclear attack is still somewhat dicey. It all depends on what kind of blast it is and how close it is. A surface or airburst will not do anything, while a nuclear depth charge is effective around 1-2 nautical miles. And, if worse comes to worse, a submarine can carry a lot of food.

From what I have been told, a deeply submerged submarine is almost impossible to detect so you'd have to depth charge the whole place!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by Hyperen
From what I have been told, a deeply submerged submarine is almost impossible to detect so you'd have to depth charge the whole place!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Let's start a new ATS project to afford one for the members

What do we need one for apart from protection from the Governments, men in black, aliens.