Would you skeptics care to explain these photos of the moon?

Viper2, I have a better idea.

Why don't you explain what they are. You are making a claim by implication, therefore being the claimant, the burden of proof is your's. So, prove to us they are what you think they are.

Well a camera glitch may seem like a poor excuse to you but to be honest that is the most logical reason if you ask me. Notice on the pictures of the supposed towers that there is no shadow left from a assumed tower on the surface. This would indicate to me there is no vertical tower.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/41af9f8d9f71.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/68cd25368d96.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6bd4dce831c3.gif[/atsimg]



How about believers explain these for me?


edit to add:

This was the website at the top of the photo
www.nrl.navy.mil...
The photo has the longitude and lattitude, why is it that there is no blur or anything like that on these images?

[edit on 15-4-2010 by zaiger]

Nevermind found it.


It is just the edge of two pictures blended together. Same thing happens to the mars rover pictures when they take panorama shots.



So imaging glitch? Or is the moon covered with these "blurred" towers?

[edit on 15-4-2010 by zaiger]

Uhhh

Clementine... what a waste of time for the DOD to place that on the internet.

I find that after looking at that, Apollo images are the greatest!

There is nothing to see on the data, they could just be brushing things out, for no reason...

...do I believe that, no!