dark cylinder type ufo

so why is the before and after photos clear?
before
i54.photobucket.com...
after
i54.photobucket.com...

Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by CYRAX

 

According to the EXIF data, those "few minutes" were exactly one minute.

thanks i did not know they recorded the times
so the before photo was 9:02am
ufo photos 9:03,9:04,9:04,9:04,9:04,n/a?
photo 7 after ufo pics 9:08am

Originally posted by CYRAX
so why is the before and after photos clear?
before

Perhaps because you've gone to take a pic, and touched the lens, thus leaving a smudge. Then when you've finished your "UFO" shots, you've wiped the lens, removing it.

This is the most plausible explanation. As to why you aren't willing to concede this point, is beyond me.

um how would i have known there was a smudge on the photos
i know that you think this is a hoax but like i said before i have been posting pics here since 2006 and i have never hoaxed anything!

Originally posted by CYRAX
i know that you think this is a hoax but like i said before i have been posting pics here since 2006 and i have never hoaxed anything!

The only one who seems to be mentioning hoax around here is you. Please show me where I've accused you of hoaxing?

And since you're the one who has put it on the table for discussion, your track record of posting solid UFO evidence, is hardly something to boast about.

No offence.

"What this looks like to me is dust/debris on the camera lens and therefore you didn't actually see it flying across the sky. Therefore, this is a hoax. I will refer you to #1 of ATS's T&C:"

"Don't forget, same position also. He claims that the "object" was rotating and moving, yet my animated image shows it neither moving, nor rotating. I smell a hoax... "

"Odd this hasn't been moved to the hoax thread yet either... "

"I don’t blame you for that because if you are judged to be hoaxing in this thread, it could be a big problem for you."
first 3 pages diff members but none from you mckyle sorry

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

Originally posted by CYRAX
"What this looks like to me is dust/debris on the camera lens and therefore you didn't actually see it flying across the sky. Therefore, this is a hoax. I will refer you to #1 of ATS's T&C:"

"Don't forget, same position also. He claims that the "object" was rotating and moving, yet my animated image shows it neither moving, nor rotating. I smell a hoax... "

"Odd this hasn't been moved to the hoax thread yet either... "

"I don’t blame you for that because if you are judged to be hoaxing in this thread, it could be a big problem for you."
first 3 pages diff members but none from you mckyle sorry

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

Now you're just confusing me: you stated above that I had stated you were hoaxing, but instead you've produced evidence that has nothing to do with any of my posts on this thread!

It seems you have some difficulty understanding what exactly relevant evidence is - and I'm not referring to the above statements by other members.

As you won't concede that your material is non-supportive of your claims that you captured a UFO on film, I would suggest that you consider closing this thread, as it's really starting to feel like we're 'flogging a dead horse'.

thats cool i will put you on my ignore list i think you should do the same then you wont be 'flogging a dead horse'

I would suggest that you consider closing this thread, as it's really starting to feel like we're 'flogging a dead horse'.

The dead horse was in the opening post and I grieve for the waste of intellect these photos have caused.

Threads like these would do better to be ignored and let them wither on the vine.

My regards to the members who stoically try to make logic prevail but me thinks your efforts would be lauded in better threads, here's to your future efforts.

Originally posted by sherpa

I would suggest that you consider closing this thread, as it's really starting to feel like we're 'flogging a dead horse'.

The dead horse was in the opening post and I grieve for the waste of intellect these photos have caused.

I couldn't agree more sherpa.

Well said mate

Originally posted by sherpa

I would suggest that you consider closing this thread, as it's really starting to feel like we're 'flogging a dead horse'.

The dead horse was in the opening post and I grieve for the waste of intellect these photos have caused.

Threads like these would do better to be ignored and let them wither on the vine.

My regards to the members who stoically try to make logic prevail but me thinks your efforts would be lauded in better threads, here's to your future efforts.

reported

"The TOPIC of this thread is the photo... Any further Off Topic posts will be met with an Off Topic deletion per the TAC. Springer... "
just to let anyone else know who has not even bothered to read the before posts and just come in here to be pains in the backside

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

reply to post by CYRAX


A vertical cylinder flying west.
And the photo comes out tilted because of the unseen vibrations.
The same with ordinary sightings.
The highly vibrating craft blurs the photos.
Got this from Bill Lyne awhile back so this might be the case
for a vertically traveling cylinder.
Good catch.
Even Oberth said the saucer tilted for forward travel.
Bill Lyne in his hot tub sighting saw light from side to the top
in advance of the large craft moving in that direction.
Its all done by the electricity that Tesla always worked with.
Moving with the ether.
Totally solved.

reply to post by Chadwickus


lol,my advice aswell! good call

Originally posted by CYRAX
"The TOPIC of this thread is the photo... Any further Off Topic posts will be met with an Off Topic deletion per the TAC. Springer... "
just to let anyone else know who has not even bothered to read the before posts and just come in here to be pains in the backside

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

[edit on 9-4-2010 by CYRAX]

Its done all over the net for UFO photos , you open up a complaint department
when you post a UFO photo. Perhaps to discourage posters of true unknowns.
I think what the people hiding the ship want most is to have hoaxes or lamp
post photos or lens flares that can be dismissed easily. That keeps the anti
Tesla agents warmed up for any unsuspecting poster with the real MacCoy.

Anyway if not the size for a pilot there is not much left but a drone or a very
strange object.

reply to post by TeslaandLyne




I found the bright version.
Up near 1:48 in.

Yet we do not see the edge or front back light distortion that might be there.
Found in this thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

For those you say it can't be, it be alright.
I figure it a regular ship adrift sideways and not a cylinder but
cylinder seem ok.
ED: Although lighting up classic saucer shape the object might be the
triangle craft.

CYRAX is on the most popular channel on youtube cyrax and flyrax

can you believe it.

Thats what they say.

No more crooked cylinders have shown up so unexplained natural phenomena.