Anti-Gravity Technology Is Real. Thank You Nikolas Tesla & John Hutchison!

Has anyone seen Jupy921's Youtube videos on the Hutchison Effect?

reply to post by Gojira


I can't decide which set of videos are more entertaining: the originals or the debunking ones which have the added value of sock puppets. Thank you for sharing the link, Gojira.

reply to post by Ha`la`tha


Thanks for the reply Ha.

I think that the mods have seen so much ad hominem as of late that the 9/11 post addressing this issue actually hit home with those who have a deep respect for what we do, as a community, here at ATS.

I am here to learn and inform, deny ignorance if you will.

And, as ironic as it may sound to some readers, the people that I do the learning from are the ones with whom I disagree.

I too am trying to go out of my way to maintain a level head, and I too get heated, but I think that in the end, anyone who has a serious interest in this community seeks the truth and will accept it.

Even if the truth is in direct contrast with our own personal belief system.

If not, then I don't think that we would have signed up and spent so much time trying to create a cool avatar, learning the ins and outs of the T & C's, learning how to use all of the modifiers on the response page, etc...

I try to always thank people when they correct me and admit my mistakes.
(notice the word try)
I am not always successful, but the more people address this topic in the threads where it becomes apparent, then the more likely we are, as a community, to diffuse this situation.

As for the OP.

I am grateful for the links that you have sent to me, and I learned from each of them.
I would even say that they have been very persuasive to me.

I will tell you that I am now beginning to question the integrity of J.H., but I am not relating one individual's integrity (or lack thereof) to the subject of anti-gravity and whether or not we have valid research supporting its existence.

He may be a hoax, but that does not mean that the subject in question is a hoax.

Again, sincere thank you, on several levels.

Cheers.

reply to post by DJW001

You're welcome Jupy's other videos are funny as hell too!
Have you seen this one?

reply to post by spikey


I met John just a few days ago for an interview. It was pretty cool. He didn't seem like a fraud when I was with him. But he is really TALL.

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]

[edit on 19-3-2010 by Gentill Abdulla]

here's more information that relates to The Hutchison Effect:

Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect:


Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on Anti-Gravity Technology:


Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985) similar to The Hutchison Effect:



[edit on 19-3-2010 by PookztA]

Boyd Bushman also supports the work of "Doctor" Rex Webb.
Here's a video of Rex Webb's Hutchison Effect replication (Please note that the YouTube user has reversed the video):

The original footage has mysteriously disappeared from Tim Ventura's American Antigravity website and Youtube page.

[edit on 20-3-2010 by Gojira]

Originally posted by Gojira
The original footage has mysteriously disappeared from Tim Ventura's American Antigravity website and Youtube page.

Gojira,

What is the name of the lost video? I will try to track it down.

If I can find it, I will post it here.

Let me know,

-Abe

reply to post by PookztA


In my opinion, this guy Bushman is the most convincing out of all of them.

Mainly because he mentioned something concrete that I can try and repeat, and his demeanor, appearance and reputation go a lot further toward convincing the status quo than J.H.

I still haven't made up my mind on J.H. yet, but if he wants to be taken seriously and do the type of stuff that he does, then he should seriously consider re-branding his image and his presentation.
As he stands right now, he is setting himself up for criticism.

Thanks for the Bushman links.

I am very curious about this kind of thing and I am always grateful when people post any information relating to the topic.

Thanks.

It was "Hutchison Effect 2010?" which is the same video as above. The YouTube user reversed the video to show Rex dropping the items instead of the items mysteriously falling up in Rex's original video on Timmy Ventura's sites. Looks like Timmy has also pulled the Rex Webb interview from his American Antigravity website as well: www.americanantigravity.com...

reply to post by PookztA


Bushman is a crackpot from the get-go.

He talks about Hutchison's "data" that he has been following.

What data is this top researcher talking about?

-The VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please find me one credible scientist anywhere that will seriously tell you that watching tv and evaluating DATA are the same thing.

In the very beginning he mentions the "data" including a floating bowling ball. How much did that ball weigh? How does he know? Was it floating or suspended? Again, how does he know?

"Data" Pfffffffft!

[edit on 20-3-2010 by K J Gunderson]

reply to post by PookztA


I do have to say however, that I am so, so, so very put off by the associations that proponents of the so-called "hutchison effect" try to tie in with 9/11.

Do they actually think that some kind of "controlled energy weapon" was used?
The probability is just way too low. Mainly because NO SUCH THING EXISTS.
It is a fairy tale that makes truthers look like cooks by association.
Besides that....
The probability that it was due to a controlled demolition is way too high.

But we will never know until we have a new investigation, and with people making claims like "directed energy weapons took down the towers", we might never get anyone to pay attention.
When people see these types of things, along side J.H. with the way he presents himself, then it makes those who seek the truth and a new investigation into 9/11 look REALLY BAD.

Like ten foil hat bad.

And that is reason enough for me to avoid him and try to debunk the guy.
And that is sad also. Because I do have an "objective curiosity" about this kind of thing.

But they need to stop this energy beam 9/11 non-sense, because I do not want one thing to do with it, and I am a huge proponent of a new investigation.

This is the same thing the government did in the 60's to discredit the anti-war movement.
They created the hippie movement and fed all of the anti-war crowd '___', the most powerful brainwashing agent known to man.

Read all about it here.

Click on and read the unfinished 16 part series called:
Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation

[edit on 3/20/2010 by Josephus23]

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
reply to post by PookztA

 

Bushman is a crackpot from the get-go.

He talks about Hutchison's "data" that he has been following.

What data is this top researcher talking about?

-The VIDEOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please find me one credible scientist anywhere that will seriously tell you that watching tv and evaluating DATA are the same thing.

In the very beginning he mentions the "data" including a floating bowling ball. How much did that ball weigh? How does he know? Was it floating or suspended? Again, how does he know?

"Data" Pfffffffft!

[edit on 20-3-2010 by K J Gunderson]

Why are you trying to tear in to Bushman?
You are presenting anecdotal criticisms and personal opinions, but nothing objective.

He gave you an experiment to go try.

I know that I am going to repeat it
Why not do the same thing instead of typing empty criticisms?

I think his comments are the most credible thing that I have seen on here.

Before you call him a crackpot, at least repeat the experiment.
And then, if it fails repeatedly, then call him a crackpot and post your results.

But if it is successful....

Then wouldn't that be interesting.

Originally posted by Josephus23


Why are you trying to tear in to Bushman?
You are presenting anecdotal criticisms and personal opinions, but nothing objective.

Did you listen to what he actually said? I did. He talks about "data" and is only talking about footage he has seen on a television screen. He has no "data." That kind of destroys any credibility his "scientific" opinion is going to have. That is why.

He gave you an experiment to go try.

I know that I am going to repeat it
Why not do the same thing instead of typing empty criticisms?

I think his comments are the most credible thing that I have seen on here.

Before you call him a crackpot, at least repeat the experiment.
And then, if it fails repeatedly, then call him a crackpot and post your results.

But if it is successful....

Then wouldn't that be interesting.

Since you cannot actually address the reason that I called him a crackpot, you pull a distraction like this? Just for you, we can address that experiment next. If you have a problem with what I actually said already then please explain to me what is valid about anyone discussing "data" that does not actually exist. You can change the subject if you address the topic first.

All of the references to Boyd Bushman seem to be on "alternative media" pages. He is sometimes referred to as a "scientist," sometimes as an "engineer," but always as a "project manager" at a variety of aerospace firms. No academic background is ever specified. His LinkedIn page is culled from the internet, implying he has not established an account to keep in touch with his colleagues. Wiki lists his birth year as 1936, which means he would have been 11 years old at the time of the alleged saucer crash in Roswell.

reply to post by K J Gunderson


I understand why you would want to criticize him for referring to data and showing us nothing.

I understand all of the criticisms that you would make, and I most likely would agree with them all.

But I am way more interested in what he either spilled the beans on or made up out of thin air.

I, like you, am here to seek truth, and anytime anyone gives me something concrete that I can repeat, then I am very grateful for that.
And for that alone I will hold off judgment on the guy.
If not, then I am criticizing obscurities and anomalies that are blatantly obvious and adding nothing really new to the mix.

I will be back when I have some results. It might take me a few days.

reply to post by Josephus23


Perhaps you should also look into Boyd Bushman's association with Rex Webb. Did you see Rex Webb's Hutchison Effect replication video: "Hutchison Effect 2010?" I sent a link to Boyd for his consideration.


[edit on 20-3-2010 by Gojira]

[edit on 20-3-2010 by Gojira]

[edit on 20-3-2010 by Gojira]

reply to post by Gojira


No, I didn't read it.

I am way more interested in the experiment that he gave us.

An experiment that literally anyone can do that either could or could not validate the guy.

That is more than 99% of what I see on here.

Most of what I see posted as evidence is the opinions of others linked to an argument.
I don't give much credence to video, as it is so easily manipulated one way or the other.

I am a bit shocked that more people aren't stoked that he gave us all something concrete and affordable that we can all try.
We can all repeat.

And we can all share results.
But as I alluded previously.

I don't know if the guy is making this up out of thin air or throwing pearls before swine.
I will let you know. I wish others would do the same.

[edit on 3/20/2010 by Josephus23]

reply to post by Josephus23


You should read about Boyd's association with Rex Webb. One would wonder why a scientist such as Boyd Bushman would associate himself with someone suspicious like Rex.

Are you referring to Boyd's Lenz Law levitation demonstration? As a scientist, Boyd should know better than to call induction levitation "antigravity".

Here's a much cooler demonstration of Lenz Law:

reply to post by Gojira


I am referring to the experiment with the two opposing magnets bolted together and then inserted into a hollow rock.

The rock is then dropped from a height simultaneously with a non-hollow rock and the time it takes each to hit the ground is recorded and compared.

He posits that the hollow rock with the bolted opposing magnets will be less affected by gravity.

Fascinating or total lies.

I will find out.

[edit on 3/20/2010 by Josephus23]