posted on Mar, 27 2010 @ 02:32 AM
I haven't watched the movie in the OP yet because I don't have much time right now. Will watch it after work so for now just a quick reply.
The first time I heard the notion "when something is not observed, it doesn't exist", was about 15 years ago and I read about it in an 'old'
book. So these theories are around for a long time. In the mean time I've seen tons of movies about the subject and read a lot of books... still the
concept is hard to grasp.
It made me wonder a few things:
I'm sitting here on my desk, only observing what is in front of me, still I 'know' that the world behind me and outside the house is also there, it
didn't stop existing just because I'm not observing it.
Personally I think the reason it is that way is because we live on this planet together with x-billion living, breathing, observing creatures who are
all interconnected and co-creating our existence. That's what keeps us in out place.
In my head it's simple, but in 15 years I never managed to explain this to someone for the first time and make them grasp it right away. It's as if,
when most people start thinking about it, they see a universe that contains only themselfs, as the observer... and they forget that there are
x-billions other observers out there, be it a fly on the wall or a virus or a microbe or something that doesn't even has the ability to be aware of
itself but can (instinctly) recognize it's food-source (which is also observation).
anyway, need to go to work now,
nice topic s-f