It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gazerstar
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I'd love to help you look. I take this kind of stuff and run with it too. LOL
I did find a picture of a crucifixion nail that was also 'allegedly' from the same era that is 8 inches long which is twice the size of the nail found in the ornament box. However, even if the nail found in the ornament box is too small to be a crucifixion nail, could it be a relic from Solomon's Temple?
Crucifixion Nail
[edit on 2-3-2010 by gazerstar]
Originally posted by Yissachar1
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Solomons Temple was destroyed... Herods Temple was a new build.. His order was that the remnant of the old temple was to be torn down and a completely new one built in its place...
The nail does not come from that time, nor the time of solomon....
Zerubabel built the second temple.. It was very small compaed to the one Yeshua preached in, and whats more was destroyed and rebuilt by Herod.. Solomons temple was built quite a bit before Zerubabels, and was destroyed by the Babylonians...
[edit on 2-3-2010 by Yissachar1]
Originally posted by gazerstar
reply to post by Stormdancer777
I did find a picture of a crucifixion nail that was also 'allegedly' from the same era that is 8 inches long which is twice the size of the nail found in the ornament box. However, even if the nail found in the ornament box is too small to be a crucifixion nail, could it be a relic from Solomon's Temple?
[edit on 2-3-2010 by gazerstar]
Originally posted by sparrow's tail
I wouldn't be surprised if they used two lengths of nails for crucifixion. The 4 inches for the hands and the 8 inches to go through the feet that were overlapped. Would make sense wouldn't it?