2012 Theory of Solar Systems in orbit outside of Galaxies., page 2

Originally posted by dzonatas

Set aside any ordinary sense of time for the duration of this particular mindset. Note that this mindset is written in matter, so no need to be apprehensive about this.

Okay, so what notion of time should I be using?

With that, we don't exclude time or matter, yet we invert E=mcc so that c is not constant and the E and m are constant.

Here's an interesting thought... But what does it mean? In an equation like E=mc^2, which has three elements, for any interesting results to occur two of them must be variables. c^2 does not count as two elements; it is one multiplied by itself.

That probably explains everything about Revelations and the parts we decided to skip.

Skip, as in to skip a rock off the waves of an ocean.

I am trying very hard to understand this, and the skipping-stone element is interesting and might help a little but why have you brought up Revelations? I did not see anything about Revelations in your post. I assume from your capitalization that you mean the biblical book, but maybe you capitalized for other reasons, in which case I might see revelations there but still don't get it.

*points that way*

Which way? Help me out here.

We calmly study the "start" and the "end" of a linear time line. Let's say we allow ourselves to study only the "first 1%" and the "last 1%". Then the other 98% is 'does not matter' to us.

The other 98% matters to me; do you mean it doesn't matter so far as the explanation of all this thing you are saying goes? Because I'm failing to grasp why this is.

There are exceptions, yet there is also separation of powers.

Everytime I point out the 'threads', either I forget or they forget.

This is my 'home' so who do you think naturally wins.

1) What are these "powers"?
2) What are these threads and do they still have to do with centers of gravity?
3) who are "they" who forget and are they forgetting the nature or the existence of these "threads?"
4) Do you mean this forum topic is your home, this discussion is your home, this planet is your home, this timeline is your home, or what?
5) Wins at what?

I'm not the only one, as others have 'joined the party' to relax. They beat me up to prove to me I stay in balance even when "I" don't want, too. There is an obvious exception to this.

What party? The party of this topic? I am so lost. Who beat you up? Are you trying to imply that you are a cosmic being of some sort?

So..., that sums up exponential power. Don't ask. Just need to ask yourself which one is true "money is life" or "money is nothing"...

Exponents? Where did that come from? I am lost again. And what does money have to do with it? Is money another metaphor for time? Because time is money? Clearly the answer is "money is nothing" but I fail to see what follows. And exponents? What?!

We accept the difference between "money if life" and "money is nothing" to be around 5%. If we, together, go beyond 5%, then we don't need a reason why. You already have the reason why.

5% difference between "money is life" and "money is nothing"? What is this 5%? 5% of what? Do you mean that 95% of the information in one is the same as 95% of the information in the other?

This is 'normal': 2%...

... anotherwords... you and they have 98% control. Isn't that more than fair? Let me answer.

Control?! Normal?! where did the 5% go?! Is this the 2% of time that we are concerned with?! What?!!?

You've completely lost me here, though.

Dust doesn't skip. Rocks do.

Okay so the speck on the spectrum is dust. Is the ocean you are talking about time? Does dust, then, float above the ocean? Does it not interact with time at all?

How does this spectrum observation interact with time, besides the fact that it has to occur within time?

I talk, you talk, and that is a clock. Tic tock.

Okay so conversation is light...?

Now apply that to a millenia, not literally, of course.

WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEAN I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE WORDS YOU ARE PRODUCING FROM YOUR KEYBOARD

As in, at time t we are seeing "visible" light, and at time t+1 we are seeing ultraviolet light.

At 2%, we don't need numbers. They make things easier, however.

I will agree to the second half, but could you explain why it only applies at 2%?

How does time shrink (dilate) and how is it analogous to an iris dilating beyond shrinking?

Blink.

So, when I blink, my eeyes are closed; i lose light for a moment. When time does whatever you're talking about, time disappears for a moment?

[edit on 3-3-2010 by Solasis]