It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IceHappy
In case you are wondering why my anger or how my posings sound, I will try and explain. I am a Viet Nam veteran who have marched 6 years running on Veterans Day only to be surrounded and harrassed by Leos. I had my rights for freedom which I served therefore earned of which one of them is freedom of speech only to be overruled by the Rich mans army.
The tragic irony, there now is a group of angry "Iraqi Vets Against the War". Who are learning what we learned.
If you stifle my rights as a decorated veteran with two honourable discharges and I have witness beatings of my fellow protesters how can I ever have faith that you Leos are fair? After all it wasn't Leos Day!
Zig Hail Leo. Your suit of armor in your avatar makes you look as you sound!
Originally posted by orwellianunenlightenment
I actually do not see anything wrong with this. The only effect putting a representative acronym or symbol on the back of a ticket would have is to possibly change the outcome of the court appearance. And change implies there is a possibility of leniency, rather than simply enforcing the letter of the law like some machine. This means that if you were maybe sad or smiley and polite, the judge might not convict for an offense that was actually committed. If the cop puts a-hole or aggressive and hostile, then he or she is pretty much saying convict on the offense which did occur. It is not as if some personal vendetta outside of court will occur.
Originally posted by richierich
Originally posted by orwellianunenlightenment
I actually do not see anything wrong with this. The only effect putting a representative acronym or symbol on the back of a ticket would have is to possibly change the outcome of the court appearance. And change implies there is a possibility of leniency, rather than simply enforcing the letter of the law like some machine. This means that if you were maybe sad or smiley and polite, the judge might not convict for an offense that was actually committed. If the cop puts a-hole or aggressive and hostile, then he or she is pretty much saying convict on the offense which did occur. It is not as if some personal vendetta outside of court will occur.
Unreal. " Change the outcome of the court appearance"...thats what you said. Hey pal, if the court appearancde, meaning the trial, is changed, that means that an injustice was done!! Cannot you see? Why should a citizen have to work for a ' smiley face ' to get a lessened fine or sentence? Why should the personal opinion of some COP count for more than the evidence? it ADDS to the stigma and prompts a judge to do something different than he would have WITHOUT the face signs....any change is extra-legal and is BAD.
Anyone that cannot comprehend the simple FACT that secret signs to a judge, under ANY circumstances, is WRONG...is simply lacking in some cognotive function...I cannot think of any other way to expalin it.
Police officers have the authority to make decisions that can affect individuals in profound and lasting ways.
One officer might decide to arrest someone for the first time, giving that person a criminal record.
Another officer in the same situation might feel that arrest is unnecessary and might use an informal tactic instead.
All criminal justice officials, including prosecutors, exercise discretion, but police are the gatekeepers to the criminal justice process, and without the decisions they make to begin the process, prosecutors and other criminal justice officials would never have the opportunity to decide the fate of criminal suspects.
One of the clear advantages associated with police discretion is that it gives law enforcement officers a measure of job satisfaction.
Indeed, research reveals that job satisfaction improves with job conditions like autonomy.
Autonomy and discretionary decision making go hand in hand.
Discretion is also advantageous because without it the wheels of justice would grind to a halt.
The negative aspects of police discretion probably outweigh the positive ones, mainly because the public’s attention is drawn to discretionary decisions when something goes wrong.
Originally posted by xstealth
You're a Georgian cop, you should know Cobb county is known for their aggressive AH police force across the nation. It all boils down to money.
Just like the new speeding ticket price increases, "for our safety" like they claim in the new radio commercials.
This is a complete lie, how stupid do they think we are? If the county couldn't get a dime from traffic violations, how many do you think they would issue?
Anyway, it is good to have more fair officers around, you seem to be one. Protect and serve the people, not the politicians with their hands out.