reply to post by GeorgeHale
Originally posted by GeorgeHale
I have recently picked up Top Secret/Majic by Stanton T. Friedman, as well as a subscription to UFO Magazine.
While I'm not saying this is a bad move, just make sure you take everything you read from Stan Friedman and Bill Birnes (publisher of UFO Magazine)
with a large grain of salt. I've seen both of these guys in many interviews and Bill has been on UFO Hunters many times, and let's just say that
they tend to make unfounded conclusions.
First of all, they are both 100% convinced of an alien origin for all UFO's. The truth is that it is impossible to know for certain exactly what
UFO's are from any scientific standpoint... it would be enough just to prove that they exist in the first place. Ufologists should be focused on
presenting a credible case for the existence of UFO's, NOT trying to convince people that "reptilians" are invading our planet.
Also, Bill Birnes in particular likes to jump the gun once in a while. In one episode of UFO Hunters, the team had an interview with a man who claimed
he had seen a UFO and was subsequently visited by "men in black" (professionals from an unknown organization), who asked him if he had seen anything
unusual recently.
Well, ok. That's a fairly interesting interview, right? We're just going off of this guy's word, but still, it's interesting to think about what
he has to say. A real ufologist from, for example, MUFON, might take interest in this and jot down some notes, record the information for future
reference, etc. But not Bill Birnes. What was Bill's reaction?
He told the man being interviewed that he was, in fact, an alien-human hybrid.
Completely ridiculous and unfounded claims like this give ufology a bad name. Stan Friedman isn't much better. So just be careful what you read.
Edit: On second thought, I guess I shouldn't put Mr. Friedman in the same category as Mr. Birnes. Stanton Friedman may have some established
convictions about an alien presence, but at least he's done research based on reliable sources, and has reasons for those convictions.
[edit on 14-3-2010 by Magnus47]