It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NightVision
Originally posted by psyko45
Answer me this....Why use any label whatsoever?
By your criteria, when a person breaks the law because of their illness, we should just drop the 'criminal' label because we risk hurting their feelings.
Perhaps that is your mental illness you speak of?
ookkkkkk....whooa there Nelly. You totally lost me. DIdnt realize this was about running a red light. Whatever though.
Perhaps what?
Ive already admitted my mental state is challenged. Or are you just trying to draw attention to it so that it may present you with some sort of gratification? If thats your thing I suppose Im happy to be of assistance.
Originally posted by NightVision
I created this thread to pose a discussion on some recent threads here that seem to have no basis in reality.
Originally posted by debris765nju
reply to post by psyko45
You might want to check the profile of soainengaged, joined 5/28/2010 and has posted 0 threads. You might want to compare his style of writing with that of NightVision.
[edit on 123030p://am3054 by debris765nju]
Originally posted by NightVision
As a disclaimer, I do believe we are being visited by ET life. But how do we draw a line here? I feel these people are mentally sick and need help.
Illness: the pathway to creative genius?
Disease, rather than being a barrier to greatness, may be its wellspring
New research in fields as diverse as music, art, science and literature suggests that we’re wrong to think that great men and women achieve despite disease. Their illness in many cases is a path, rather than an obstacle, to genius. Einstein, Warhol, Newton, Cézanne, Goya, Michelangelo, Turner and Berlioz are among many whose achievements are now thought to have been influenced by disease. Conditions such as depression, autism, myopia, anxiety, chronic pain, gout, stroke and dementia heavily influenced their paths to creativity.
“Illness has affected the artistic achievement of musical composers, classical painters, creative authors, and sculptors,” says Paul Wolf, a clinical pathologist from the University of California, who specialises in investigating the effects of disease and drugs on the creativity and productivity of sculptors, painters, composers and authors. “The associations between illness and art may be close because of both the actual physical limitations of the artists and their mental adaptation to disease.”
According to Dr Wolf, Michelangelo had symptoms of gout and bipolar disorder, a form of manic-depressive mental illness. He painted more than 400 figures on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel between 1508 and 1512, and Dr Wolf says that his paintings mirror his depression. Features of melancholy appear, for example, in the depiction of the prophet Jeremiah in the Sistine. Michelangelo’s gout also makes an appearance in a fresco by Raphael, now in the Vatican Palace, which depicts the artist with a gouty, deformed right knee.
The link between artistic achievement and depression has inspired an exhibition at the Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, Genius and Insanity in the West, which runs until January 16. The work of Goya, Rodin, Van Gogh, Munch and Picasso is on show. According to its organisers, melancholy is a key element in the temperaments of those marked for greatness.
But it isn’t just mental illness that is influential. Eye conditions, including short-sightedness and cataracts, have also had a significant impact on creativity. According to reports by researchers from the St Louis University School of Medicine, in Missouri, cataracts appear to have been a particular affliction of the early Impressionists. “Monet’s serial paintings of the Bridge at Giverny clearly demonstrate the effects of cataracts on painting, with the bridge slowly disappearing over time,” says John Morley, an author and professor of gerontology at St Louis. “Renoir and the American Impressionist painter Mary Cassatt were also afflicted with cataracts. This plethora of cataracts among artists of this time has led to the concept that Impressionism is the world seen through cataracts. The researchers say that those who influenced the Impressionists were also affected by cataracts, and give JMW Turner as an example, while several of the works of the Norwegian Expressionist painter Edvard Munch depict a large floater which obstructed his vision towards the end of his life.
“Constable’s blue-green colour-blindness accounted for his colouring of his landscapes which are primarily yellow and brown,” says Dr Morley. He believes the fact that the postImpressionist painter Cézanne was diabetic was also influential. The artist developed a condition called diabetic retinopathy, which causes blue-green colour-blindness, and may account for some of his colour choices in later paintings, which became more subdued. Van Gogh’s famous painting Starry Night may have been the result of the artist’s epilepsy. He was treated with digitalis and the painting represents a classic example of the haloes seen by someone suffering the side-effects of this toxic drug, according to the St Louis researchers.
At Oxford, Ioan James, a professor of geometry, is writing a book in which he investigates whether 20 influential figures, including Einstein and Newton, the composer Bartók, the mathematician Alan Turing and the artist Andy Warhol, had Asperger’s syndrome, a mild autism characterised by extremely focused attention. James argues that the obsessive and repetitious behaviour often associated with autism was a positive thing in these people. “Perseverance, perfectionism, disregard for social conventions and unconcern about the opinions of others could be seen as a prerequisite for creativity, and these are also behaviours associated with Asperger’s,” he says.
Much of the research on disease and creativity has centred on historical cases, but a remarkable case reported two years ago by American neurologists from the University of California, at Davis, and published in the medical journal Neurology, shows how artistic skills can evolve from disease. It involved a woman in her fifties who developed a rare disease, frontotemporal dementia, which affected the left side of the brain. Over several years her brain gradually deteriorated and she had more and more difficulty talking. But during the same period, her artistic skills improved dramatically. Despite, or perhaps because of, her illness she was able not only to paint but to sell her work. It was described by the research leader, Dr Bruce Miller, a neurologist from California University, as some of the most beautiful he has seen.
Exactly how it came about is not clear, but the left side of the brain is involved with language and words, while the right side is more involved in visual creativity. One theory put forward by the neurologists who treated her was that the decline of the left side took the shackles from the right, allowing more creative freedom and experimentation: “The study of artistic development in the setting of this dementia suggests that language is not required for, and may even inhibit, certain types of visual creativity.”
Source and rest of article: www.timesonline.co.uk...