It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ausar
everyone is equal to sin?!
but 2 has a different place when put in an equation. since men are not women there is a distinction between both and one can be counted and the other can count.to say one is what is expressed as the other; well, in some spiritual circles the incorporation of "divine feminine" is "necessary in "men": are they then goddesses?
Originally posted by Copperflower
What better way to convert someone than to pander to a popular theme that plays on the suffering of half of the population?
If women were goddesses, I think they would know it. And so would everyone else!
First of all, we would no longer have terms like "man" and "woman" since all would be gods.
If only some are, then, as I said, we would ALL know it. After all, that's why we have the distinction in terms.
Right?
Women are men with wombs. Womb-man
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by randyvs
What I mean by that is,
woman is everything man is -
plus the oven.
I love that.
Without dismissing all the very serious issues between the genders, who cares what came first. Maybe the point is, the energy that became conscious and then came into form is still working, trying to bring itself into balance and if our respective forms can put aside many of the irritating and downright destructive divisions in language between what's male or female, the whole consciousness of form might be much, much happier; more balanced if you will. Language, words, are the platform for our understanding of anything, and much of it could change for a new and better understanding to replace old, bad misunderstandings of gender.
The word "woman" was a simple way